```markdown --- id: plan-base-de-conhecimento ai_update_goal: "Define the stages, owners, and evidence required to complete Base De Conhecimento." required_inputs: - "Task summary or issue link describing the goal" - "Relevant documentation sections from docs/README.md" - "Matching agent playbooks from agents/README.md" success_criteria: - "Stages list clear owners, deliverables, and success signals" - "Plan references documentation and agent resources that exist today" - "Follow-up actions and evidence expectations are recorded" related_agents: - "code-reviewer" - "bug-fixer" - "feature-developer" - "refactoring-specialist" - "test-writer" - "documentation-writer" - "performance-optimizer" - "security-auditor" - "backend-specialist" - "frontend-specialist" - "architect-specialist" - "devops-specialist" - "database-specialist" - "mobile-specialist" --- # Base De Conhecimento Plan > This plan aims to establish a comprehensive knowledge base for the repository, ensuring that all documentation is up-to-date, accurate, and aligned with the current state of the codebase and agent playbooks. ## Task Snapshot - **Primary goal:** Create and maintain a robust knowledge base that serves as a single source of truth for the repository, including documentation, agent playbooks, and collaboration plans. - **Success signal:** All documentation and agent playbooks are reviewed, updated, and aligned with the current repository state. The knowledge base is easily navigable and serves as a reliable reference for contributors. - **Key references:** - [Documentation Index](../docs/README.md) - [Agent Handbook](../agents/README.md) - [Plans Index](./README.md) ## Agent Lineup | Agent | Role in this plan | Playbook | First responsibility focus | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Code Reviewer | Ensures all documentation and playbook updates adhere to quality standards and best practices. | [Code Reviewer](../agents/code-reviewer.md) | Review documentation and playbook updates for clarity, accuracy, and completeness. | | Bug Fixer | Identifies and resolves inconsistencies or errors in the documentation and playbooks. | [Bug Fixer](../agents/bug-fixer.md) | Analyze reported issues in documentation and playbooks and propose fixes. | | Feature Developer | Implements new sections or features in the documentation and playbooks as needed. | [Feature Developer](../agents/feature-developer.md) | Develop new documentation sections or playbook features based on requirements. | | Refactoring Specialist | Improves the structure and organization of the documentation and playbooks. | [Refactoring Specialist](../agents/refactoring-specialist.md) | Identify and refactor poorly structured or outdated documentation and playbook sections. | | Test Writer | Ensures that all documentation and playbook updates are thoroughly tested and validated. | [Test Writer](../agents/test-writer.md) | Write tests to validate the accuracy and completeness of documentation and playbook updates. | | Documentation Writer | Creates and updates documentation to ensure it is clear, comprehensive, and up-to-date. | [Documentation Writer](../agents/documentation-writer.md) | Draft and update documentation sections to reflect the current state of the repository. | | Performance Optimizer | Ensures that the documentation and playbooks are optimized for performance and usability. | [Performance Optimizer](../agents/performance-optimizer.md) | Identify and resolve performance bottlenecks in documentation and playbook access and usage. | | Security Auditor | Ensures that the documentation and playbooks adhere to security best practices and compliance requirements. | [Security Auditor](../agents/security-auditor.md) | Audit documentation and playbooks for security vulnerabilities and compliance issues. | | Backend Specialist | Ensures that the backend-related documentation and playbooks are accurate and up-to-date. | [Backend Specialist](../agents/backend-specialist.md) | Review and update backend-related documentation and playbook sections. | | Frontend Specialist | Ensures that the frontend-related documentation and playbooks are accurate and up-to-date. | [Frontend Specialist](../agents/frontend-specialist.md) | Review and update frontend-related documentation and playbook sections. | | Architect Specialist | Ensures that the architectural documentation and playbooks are accurate and up-to-date. | [Architect Specialist](../agents/architect-specialist.md) | Review and update architectural documentation and playbook sections. | | Devops Specialist | Ensures that the DevOps-related documentation and playbooks are accurate and up-to-date. | [Devops Specialist](../agents/devops-specialist.md) | Review and update DevOps-related documentation and playbook sections. | | Database Specialist | Ensures that the database-related documentation and playbooks are accurate and up-to-date. | [Database Specialist](../agents/database-specialist.md) | Review and update database-related documentation and playbook sections. | | Mobile Specialist | Ensures that the mobile-related documentation and playbooks are accurate and up-to-date. | [Mobile Specialist](../agents/mobile-specialist.md) | Review and update mobile-related documentation and playbook sections. | ## Documentation Touchpoints | Guide | File | Task Marker | Primary Inputs | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Project Overview | [project-overview.md](../docs/project-overview.md) | agent-update:project-overview | Roadmap, README, stakeholder notes | | Architecture Notes | [architecture.md](../docs/architecture.md) | agent-update:architecture-notes | ADRs, service boundaries, dependency graphs | | Development Workflow | [development-workflow.md](../docs/development-workflow.md) | agent-update:development-workflow | Branching rules, CI config, contributing guide | | Testing Strategy | [testing-strategy.md](../docs/testing-strategy.md) | agent-update:testing-strategy | Test configs, CI gates, known flaky suites | | Glossary & Domain Concepts | [glossary.md](../docs/glossary.md) | agent-update:glossary | Business terminology, user personas, domain rules | | Data Flow & Integrations | [data-flow.md](../docs/data-flow.md) | agent-update:data-flow | System diagrams, integration specs, queue topics | | Security & Compliance Notes | [security.md](../docs/security.md) | agent-update:security | Auth model, secrets management, compliance requirements | | Tooling & Productivity Guide | [tooling.md](../docs/tooling.md) | agent-update:tooling | CLI scripts, IDE configs, automation workflows | ## Risk Assessment Identify potential blockers, dependencies, and mitigation strategies before beginning work. ### Identified Risks | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy | Owner | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Dependency on external team for documentation review | Medium | High | Schedule early coordination meetings and establish clear review timelines | Documentation Writer | | Insufficient test coverage for documentation updates | Low | Medium | Allocate dedicated time for test writing and validation in Phase 2 | Test Writer | ### Dependencies - **Internal:** Collaboration with development teams to ensure documentation reflects current codebase state. - **External:** Review and approval from stakeholders for major documentation updates. - **Technical:** Access to up-to-date repository state and CI/CD pipelines for validation. ### Assumptions - Assume that the current API schema and architectural decisions remain stable during the documentation update process. - Assume that all agents have access to the necessary tools and resources to complete their tasks. - If assumptions prove false, schedule a review meeting to reassess the plan and adjust timelines accordingly. ## Resource Estimation ### Time Allocation | Phase | Estimated Effort | Calendar Time | Team Size | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Phase 1 - Discovery | 2 person-days | 3-5 days | 1-2 people | | Phase 2 - Implementation | 5 person-days | 1-2 weeks | 2-3 people | | Phase 3 - Validation | 2 person-days | 3-5 days | 1-2 people | | **Total** | **9 person-days** | **2-3 weeks** | **2-3 people** | ### Required Skills - Technical writing and documentation management. - Familiarity with the repository structure and codebase. - Experience with CI/CD pipelines and testing strategies. - Knowledge of security best practices and compliance requirements. ### Resource Availability - **Available:** Documentation Writer, Test Writer, Code Reviewer, and other relevant agents as needed. - **Blocked:** None identified at this time. - **Escalation:** Project Manager or Lead Developer if additional resources are required. ## Working Phases ### Phase 1 — Discovery & Alignment **Steps** 1. Review the current state of the repository and identify gaps in documentation and playbooks. (Owner: Documentation Writer) 2. Coordinate with development teams to gather necessary inputs and clarify open questions. (Owner: Documentation Writer) 3. Create a detailed inventory of existing documentation and playbooks, noting areas that require updates or improvements. (Owner: Documentation Writer) **Commit Checkpoint** - After completing this phase, capture the agreed context and create a commit (for example, `git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase 1 discovery"`). ### Phase 2 — Implementation & Iteration **Steps** 1. Update documentation and playbooks based on the inventory created in Phase 1. (Owner: Documentation Writer, with support from relevant specialists) 2. Conduct regular reviews to ensure updates align with the current repository state and best practices. (Owner: Code Reviewer) 3. Write and execute tests to validate the accuracy and completeness of documentation and playbook updates. (Owner: Test Writer) **Commit Checkpoint** - Summarize progress, update cross-links, and create a commit documenting the outcomes of this phase (for example, `git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase 2 implementation"`). ### Phase 3 — Validation & Handoff **Steps** 1. Perform a final review of all documentation and playbook updates to ensure they meet quality standards. (Owner: Code Reviewer) 2. Validate that all tests pass and that the documentation accurately reflects the current state of the repository. (Owner: Test Writer) 3. Document evidence of validation, including test results and review feedback. (Owner: Documentation Writer) **Commit Checkpoint** - Record the validation evidence and create a commit signalling the handoff completion (for example, `git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase 3 validation"`). ## Rollback Plan Document how to revert changes if issues arise during or after implementation. ### Rollback Triggers When to initiate rollback: - Critical inaccuracies or inconsistencies in documentation that could mislead contributors. - Performance degradation in documentation access or usability. - Security vulnerabilities introduced in documentation or playbooks. - Major discrepancies between documentation and the actual repository state. ### Rollback Procedures #### Phase 1 Rollback - Action: Discard discovery branch, restore previous documentation state. - Data Impact: None (no production changes). - Estimated Time: < 1 hour. #### Phase 2 Rollback - Action: Revert commits, restore documentation to pre-update state. - Data Impact: None (documentation changes are not yet in production). - Estimated Time: 1-2 hours. #### Phase 3 Rollback - Action: Full documentation rollback, restore previous version. - Data Impact: None (documentation changes are not yet in production). - Estimated Time: 1 hour. ### Post-Rollback Actions 1. Document reason for rollback in incident report. 2. Notify stakeholders of rollback and impact. 3. Schedule post-mortem to analyze failure. 4. Update plan with lessons learned before retry. ## Agent Playbook Checklist 1. Pick the agent that matches your task. 2. Enrich the template with project-specific context or links. 3. Share the final prompt with your AI assistant. 4. Capture learnings in the relevant documentation file so future runs improve. ## Evidence & Follow-up - **Artifacts to collect:** - PR links for documentation and playbook updates. - Test results and validation reports. - Review feedback and approvals from stakeholders. - Incident reports and post-mortem notes (if applicable). - **Follow-up actions:** - Schedule regular reviews to ensure documentation remains up-to-date. - Monitor feedback from contributors and address any issues promptly. ```