* fix(baileys): update LID contact phone number if not present
* fix(baileys): move try_update_contact_avatar call to update_contact_information method
* refactor(baileys): consolidate contact update logic in update_contact_information method
* fix: ignore action events
* feat(zapi): allow updating instance ID
* feat: handle `chatLid` field
* test: break down handler specs into separate files
* feat: update send_message method to use recipient_id logic for zapi provider
* fix: use identifier instead of source_id for zapi
* test: fix specs
* feat: prioritize senderName over chatName for contact naming in received callback
This PR fixes URL parsing errors when WhatsApp template parameters
contain URLs with spaces or special characters. The solution adds proper
URL normalization using Addressable::URI before validation, which
automatically handles space encoding and special character
normalization.
Related with https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12462
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5692/whatsapp-es-numbers-stuck-in-pending-due-to-premature-registration
### Problem
Multiple customers reported that their WhatsApp numbers remain stuck in
**Pending** in WhatsApp Manager even after successful onboarding.
- Our system triggers a **registration call**
(`/<PHONE_NUMBER_ID>/register`) as soon as the number is OTP verified.
- In many cases, Meta hasn’t finished **display name
review/provisioning**, so the call fails with:
```
code: 100, error_subcode: 2388001
error_user_title: "Cannot Create Certificate"
error_user_msg: "Your display name could not be processed. Please edit
your display name and try again."
```
- This leaves the number stuck in Pending, no messaging can start until
we manually retry registration.
- Some customers have reported being stuck in this state for **7+
days**.
### Root cause
- We only check `code_verification_status = VERIFIED` before attempting
registration.
- We **don’t wait** for display name provisioning (`name_status` /
`platform_type`) to be complete.
- As a result, registration fails prematurely and the number never
transitions out of Pending.
### Solution
#### 1. Health Status Monitoring
- Build a backend service to fetch **real-time health data** from Graph
API:
- `code_verification_status`
- `name_status` / `display_name_status`
- `platform_type`
- `throughput.level`
- `messaging_limit_tier`
- `quality_rating`
- Expose health data via API
(`/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:id/health`).
- Display this in the UI as an **Account Health tab** with clear badges
and direct links to WhatsApp Manager.
#### 2. Smarter Registration Logic
- Update `WebhookSetupService` to include a **dual-condition check**:
- Register if:
1. Phone is **not verified**, OR
2. Phone is **verified but provisioning incomplete** (`platform_type =
NOT_APPLICABLE`, `throughput.level = NOT_APPLICABLE`).
- Skip registration if number is already provisioned.
- Retry registration automatically when stuck.
- Provide a UI banner with complete registration button so customers can
retry without manual support.
### Screenshot
<img width="2292" height="1344" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-30 at 16 01
03@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c417d2a-b11c-475e-b092-3c5671ee59a7"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR implements the **"Lock to Single Conversation"** option for
Telegram inboxes, bringing it to parity with WhatsApp, SMS, and other
channels.
- When **enabled**: resolved conversations can be reopened (single
thread).
- When **disabled**: new messages from a resolved conversation create a
**new conversation**.
- Added **agent name display** in outgoing Telegram messages (formatted
as `Agent Name: message`).
- Updated frontend to display agent name above messages in the dashboard
(consistent with WhatsApp behavior).
This fixes [#8046](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8046).
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit tests added in
`spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb`
- Scenarios covered:
- Lock enabled → reopens resolved conversation
- Lock disabled → creates new conversation if resolved
- Lock disabled → appends to last open conversation
- Manual tests:
1. Create a Telegram conversation
2. Mark it as resolved
3. Send a new message from same user
4. ✅ Expected: new conversation created (if lock disabled)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Additional Documentation
For full technical details of this implementation, please refer to:
[TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md](./TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
This pull request introduces an optional parameter, `phone_number_id`,
to the WhatsApp API call responsible for retrieving media. The addition
of this parameter allows for greater flexibility when interacting with
the WhatsApp API, as it can now accommodate scenarios where specifying a
particular phone number ID is necessary. This change is backward
compatible and does not affect existing functionality if the parameter
is not provided.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
The changes were tested locally by invoking the WhatsApp media retrieval
API with and without the `phone_number_id` parameter. Both scenarios
were verified to ensure that:
- When `phone_number_id` is provided, the API call includes the
parameter and functions as expected.
- When `phone_number_id` is omitted, the API call continues to work as
before, maintaining backward compatibility.
No errors or warnings were observed during testing, and all relevant
unit tests passed successfully.
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
when filtering contacts by phone number a + is always added to the
begining of the query, this means that the filtering breaks if the
complete phone number with international code and + is entered
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Updated automated tests
Tested manually with contact filtering UI
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [X] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Ensure messages go to correct conversation when receive multi user in 1
LINE webhook.
base on
[document](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#webhook-event-objects:~:text=There%20is%20not%20necessarily%20one%20user%20per%20webhook).
it said
```
There is not necessarily one user per webhook.
A message event from person A and a follow event from person B may be in the same webhook.
```
this PR has 1 break changes.
In old version. when receive
[follow](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#follow-event)
event, it will create conversation with no messages.
After this PR. when receive follow event, it will not create
conversation, contact and messages
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add test case.
and follow event test by delete conversation, and block and unblock line
account
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This pull request allow LINE to receive files.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add testcase. and test manually by myself.
in case you want to test in android, use native share method to share
files to LINE.
you can share more file types to LINE (native line share only send
image,video and audio).
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
- Add support for using labels as an action event for automation
- Fix duplicated conversation_updated event dispatch for labels
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8539 and multiple
issues around duplication related to label change events.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR is part of https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12259. It
adds a default expiry of 180 days for tokens issued on the widget. The
expiry can be customized based on customer requests and internal
security requirements.
Co-authored-by: Balasaheb Dubale <bdubale@entrata.com>
* feat(baileys): add status method to fetch Baileys API version and availability
* test: specs
* chore: raise error instead of returning error in version
* feat(whatsapp): add profile picture fetching for Baileys provider
- Add `get_profile_pic` method to `WhatsappBaileysService` for fetching contact avatars
- Include `avatar_url` in contact attributes during contact creation
- Update `MessagesUpsert` handler to fetch and set profile pictures
- Add proper error handling and graceful degradation when avatar fetching fails
* test(whatsapp): add test coverage for Baileys profile picture fetching
- Add test suite for `get_profile_pic` method
- Include test scenarios for successful responses, missing avatars, and error handling
- Add profile picture HTTP stubbing and avatar job expectations to message processing tests
* feat(whatsapp): optimize Baileys avatar fetching and update avatar for existing inboxes
Previously, the profile picture was fetched on every incoming message and avatar updates were only attempted for new inboxes.
This change optimizes the process by:
- Only fetching the WhatsApp profile picture if the contact does not already have an avatar.
- Attempting to update the avatar for both new and existing inboxes.
This logic is based on Telegram's version (app/services/telegram/incoming_message_service.rb).
* refactor(whatsapp): remove unnecessary safe navigation when accessing contact
This reverts an unnecessary change introduced in b918a92.
* refactor(whatsapp): manually rollback change introduced in b918a92
* refactor(whatsapp): rename endpoint to profile-picture-url
* refactor(whatsapp): simplify profile picture response handling
Replaced manual JSON parsing with HTTParty's parsed_response and removed redundant JSON parsing tests.
* test(whatsapp): separate avatar processing test from message creation test
* test(whatsapp): update profile picture test to match actual API behavior
Change test to expect a 404 response when no profile picture exists, instead of a 200 response with partial data.
* refactor: move new functions to helper module
* test: more specs
---------
Co-authored-by: gabrieljablonski <contact@gabrieljablonski.com>
Added comprehensive Twilio WhatsApp content template support (Phase 1)
enabling text, media, and quick reply templates with proper parameter
conversion, sync capabilities.
**Template Types Supported**
- Basic Text Templates: Simple text with variables ({{1}}, {{2}})
- Media Templates: Image/Video/Document templates with text variables
- Quick Reply Templates: Interactive button templates
Front end changes is available via #12277
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
## Reference
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12149#issuecomment-3178108388
## Description
setup_webhook was done before the save, and hence the meta webhook
validation might fail because of a race condition where the facebook
validation is done before we saving the entry to the database.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- New inbox creation, webhook validation
- Existing inbox update, webhook validation
-
<img width="614" height="674" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be223945-deed-475a-82e5-3ae9c54a13fa"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
WhatsApp templates without parameters (body-only templates like
notifications, confirmations) were failing to send with the error:
ArgumentError (Unknown legacy format: NilClass). This affected all
parameter-less templates across marketing messages, notifications, and
utility templates.
WhatsApp template message errors were not being properly handled because
the `@message instance` variable was only set in the `send_message`
method but not in `send_template`. When template sending failed, the
`handle_error` method couldn't update the message status due to the
missing @message reference, resulting in silent failures with no user
feedback.
## Summary
- handle Twilio failures per contact when running one-off SMS campaigns
- rescue errors in WhatsApp and generic SMS one-off campaigns so they
continue
- add specs confirming campaigns continue sending when a single contact
fails
fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/9000
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This update adds support to the coexistence method to Embedded Whatsapp,
allowing users to add their existing whatsapp business number in order
to use it in both places(chatwoot and whatsapp business) at the same
time.
This update require some changes in the permissions for the Meta App, as
described in the Meta Oficial Docs, I'll leave this listed below:
- **history** — describes past messages the business customer has
sent/received
- **smb_app_state_sync** — describes the business customer's current and
new contacts
- **smb_message_echoes** — describes any new messages the business
customer sends with the WhatsApp Business app after having been
onboarded
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
The term "sorcerer’s apprentice mode" is defined as a bug in a protocol
where, under some circumstances, the receipt of a message causes
multiple messages to be sent, each of which, when received, triggers the
same bug. - RFC3834
Reference: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/9606
This PR:
- Adds an auto_reply attribute to message.
- Adds an auto_reply attribute to conversation.
- Disable conversation_created / conversation_opened event if auto_reply
is set.
- Disable message_created event if auto_reply is set.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
