Admin configura em Account Settings → Agents → Editar quais inboxes
disparam o banner agressivo (reopened + inatividade) pra cada agente.
- user.ui_settings.aggressive_alert_inbox_ids: null (todas) | [] (nenhuma) | [1,2,3]
- Filtro aplicado no actionCable.feedInactivityTracker, maybeTriggerAggressiveAlert
e no hydrate do AggressiveConversationBanner
- Backend aceita ui_settings no agents#update e serializa em _agent.json.jbuilder
- UI no EditAgent com toggle "todas inboxes" + multiselect
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bug reportado em 2026-04-24: só o banner vermelho status→open
funcionava. 5/15/28min nunca disparavam.
Causa: o tracker só era alimentado via websocket ao vivo
(message.created). Se a msg do cliente chegou ANTES da aba carregar
(ou depois de F5), o tracker ficava vazio, setInterval nunca começava,
thresholds nunca disparavam.
Fix:
- Nova função `hydrateFromConversations(convs)` no tracker. Varre
conversas em 'open', pega a última msg não-activity, se for de
Contact registra com timestamp REAL (msg.created_at), não Date.now().
Isso fecha o gap de tempo: se o cliente falou 7min atrás, o YELLOW
já dispara na hora.
- AggressiveConversationBanner.vue tem agora `watch: allConversations`
chamando hydrate toda vez que a lista muda (boot + F5 + navegação).
- parseCreatedAt() suporta Unix seconds + ISO.
- findLastNonActivityMessage() ignora mensagens de sistema.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Banner agressivo passa de uma notificação só ("status→open") pra
um sistema de escalada baseado em inatividade quando o cliente é
o último a falar.
Níveis:
- 5 min sem resposta → AMARELO, sem som
- 15 min sem resposta → LARANJA, beep 1x + notificação do SO
- 28 min sem resposta → VERMELHO pulsante + som em loop infinito
- status→open (reabertura) → VERMELHO imediato
Por conversa, o banner mostra um item com nome do contato, inbox
e contexto ("reabriu agora" / "15 min sem resposta"). Headline
grande e explicação clara sobre como limpa.
Comportamento do × dismiss:
- Antes: apagava o alerta de vez. Agente podia "fingir que viu".
- Agora: esconde temporariamente. Volta quando escalar (próximo
threshold) ou nova mensagem. A única forma de LIMPAR de vez é
responder o cliente (tracker detecta msg outgoing do User ou
AgentBot e chama dismissForReply).
Permissões:
- account.settings.aggressive_alert_enabled (master switch admin)
- user.ui_settings.aggressive_alert_enabled (toggle do próprio agente)
- Default true pros dois; um false em qualquer bloqueia alertas.
Settings UI:
- Conta → General: novo card "Alerta agressivo (master switch)"
- Perfil do usuário: novo card "Receber alertas agressivos"
Arquivos:
- helper/aggressiveAlert.js: multi-level state, hide vs dismiss-for-reply
- helper/inactivityAlertTracker.js: timer único, thresholds declarativos
- helper/actionCable.js: hook em onMessageCreated (feed tracker) +
isAggressiveAlertEnabled() + limpa tracker em status_changed != open
- components/app/AggressiveConversationBanner.vue: variantes de cor,
headline grande, explanation, × temp-hide
- account.rb + accounts_controller.rb: store_accessor + permitted
- settings UI components (account + profile): switches auto-persist
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Banner persistente + som em loop + OS notification + title flash
+ vibração mobile quando conversa transiciona pra 'open' vindo de
pending/snoozed/resolved. Exige interação pra dismissar — atendente
não perde evento de reabertura.
- AggressiveConversationBanner.vue: banner full-width no topo,
dismissable, mostra nome do contato + inbox + status anterior
- aggressiveAlert.js: manager do som (loop infinito), title flash
(intervalo 1s), Notification API (requireInteraction: true),
navigator.vibrate (padrão 500-200-500-200-500)
- actionCable.onStatusChange: detecta transição pra 'open' e dispara
trigger via BUS_EVENTS (só se status anterior ≠ open, pra não
alertar conversa nova criada já em open)
- i18n pt_BR + en: chaves de notificação (title/body/dismiss)
- busEvents: AGGRESSIVE_ALERT_TRIGGER + AGGRESSIVE_ALERT_DISMISS
Camada 1 da feature. Camada 2 (escalation SMS/WhatsApp se não
dismissar em X segundos) fica pra outro PR.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- RetentionSummaryBadge in the "Previous conversations" sidebar:
tiered status (First contact / Active / Recurring / Sleeping /
At risk / Inactive) + counts of interactions, one-shots, Pix.
- Retention tab in Captain Reports: KpiCards, FlowCard, CohortMatrix
(12x13 heatmap with CSV export).
- Five new filters on the contacts list: recurring, last interaction,
days since, interactions count, reservations paid.
- Full pt_BR + en i18n under CAPTAIN_REPORTS.RETENTION.*
- Spec for InteractionCalculatorService covering gap behavior,
one-shot classification, internal-label exclusion, multi-conversation
grouping across the 30h window.
- Docs: docs/captain-retention-indicators.md with business rules,
column reference, endpoint shape, and backup SQL queries.
* feat: add audio transcoding support for WhatsApp Cloud API
- Introduced `Audio::TranscodeService` to handle audio transcoding to OGG/Opus format.
- Updated `Messages::MessageBuilder` to transcode audio attachments based on `transcode_audio` parameter.
- Enhanced `WhatsappCloudService` to normalize audio content types and send voice flag for recorded audio in OGG format.
- Added utility functions for audio conversion in JavaScript.
- Updated Dockerfile to include FFmpeg for audio processing.
- Added tests for audio transcoding and WhatsApp Cloud service interactions.
* feat: enhance audio handling with transcoding support and error management
* feat: improve audio transcoding error handling and enhance audio recording features
* feat: enhance audio transcoding process and error handling for better reliability
* feat: update recorded audio handling to support boolean and array formats
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for removing labels from the conversation card
context menu. Assigned labels now show a checkmark, and clicking an
already-selected label will remove it.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6400/allow-removing-labels-directly-from-the-right-click-menuhttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13367
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e3a6080-a67d-4851-9d10-d8dbf3ceeb04
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Adds missing analytics instrumentation for the editor AI funnel so we
can measure end-to-end usage and outcome quality.
### What was added
- Captain: Editor AI menu opened
- Captain: Generation failed
- Captain: AI-assisted message sent
### Behavior covered
- Tracks AI button click + menu open from both entry points:
- top panel sparkle button
- inline editor copilot button
- Tracks generation failures (initial + follow-up stages).
- Tracks whether accepted AI content was sent as-is or edited before
send.
### Notes
- Applies to editor Captain accept/send flow
(rewrite/summarize/reply_suggestion + follow-ups).
- Does not change Copilot sidebar flow instrumentation.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Manual verification steps
<img width="1906" height="832" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0ade43b-aa8d-41be-8ca2-20a091a81f60"
/>
<img width="828" height="280" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be76219e-fb61-4a6e-bff5-dc085b0a3cc9"
/>
<img width="415" height="147" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36802c5c-33a7-49ed-bf7e-f0b02d86dccc"
/>
<img width="2040" height="516" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74b95288-bc86-4312-a282-14211ae8f25c"
/>
1. Open a conversation with Captain tasks enabled.
2. Click AI button in top panel and inline editor.
3. Confirm analytics events fire for:
- AI menu opened
4. Run an AI action and force a failure scenario (or empty response
path) and confirm generation-failed event.
5. Accept AI output, then:
- send without changes -> editedBeforeSend: false
- edit then send -> editedBeforeSend: true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
Fix hardcoded `Chatwoot` branding in two UI tooltips using the existing
`useBranding` flow so self-hosted/white-label deployments no longer show
the wrong brand text.
## Changes
- LabelSuggestion tooltip now uses:
- `replaceInstallationName($t('LABEL_MGMT.SUGGESTIONS.POWERED_BY'))`
- Message avatar tooltip (native app/external echo) now uses:
- `replaceInstallationName(t('CONVERSATION.NATIVE_APP_ADVISORY'))`
## Why
This follows the existing branding pattern already used in the product
and keeps behavior consistent across deployments.
## Notes
- No change to message logic or API behavior.
- `AGENTS.md` updated with a branding guidance note.
## Fixes
- Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13306
- Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13466
## Testing
<img width="195" height="155" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 3 55 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b295cdd-6e5d-42c0-bbd7-23ba7052e1c3"
/>
<img width="721" height="152" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 3 55 48 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/19cec2a0-451f-4fb3-bd61-7c2e591fc3c7"
/>
* feat(scheduled-messages): add WhatsApp templates
* fix: update inboxId prop type to accept both Number and String; localize template labels in conversation.json
* feat: Adds model for scheduling messages
* feat: Implement scheduled message handling and processing jobs
* feat: Add ScheduledMessagesController and associated specs for managing scheduled messages
* refactor: Simplify scheduled message job specs and improve metadata handling
* feat: Add ScheduledMessagePolicy for managing access to scheduled messages
* feat: Add routes for managing scheduled messages
* feat: Add scheduled message event handling and broadcasting
* feat: Add JSON views for scheduled messages creation, destruction, updating, and indexing
* feat: Update scheduled message status and dispatch update event after message creation
* feat: Ensure scheduled message updates trigger dispatch event
* feat: Add mutation types for managing scheduled messages
* feat: Add additionalAttributes prop to Message component and provider
* feat: Implement scheduled message handling in ActionCable and Vuex store
* feat: Add unit tests for scheduled messages actions and mutations
* feat: implement scheduled messages functionality
- Added support for scheduling messages in the conversation dashboard.
- Introduced new components: ScheduledMessageModal and ScheduledMessages for managing scheduled messages.
- Enhanced ReplyBottomPanel to include scheduling options.
- Updated Base.vue to handle scheduled message styling.
- Integrated Vuex store module for managing scheduled messages state.
- Added necessary translations for scheduled messages in English and Portuguese.
* feat: add pagination to scheduled messages index and update tests accordingly
* chore: update scheduled messages specs for future time validation and response status
* chore: enhance scheduled messages API with pagination and add skeleton loader component
* feat: add create_scheduled_message action to automation rule attributes
* feat: implement create_scheduled_message action and enhance attachment handling
* feat: add scheduled message functionality with UI components and localization
* test: enhance scheduledMessages mutations tests with meta handling and structure
* chore: update label to display file name upon successful upload in AutomationFileInput component
* feat: add initialAttachment prop to ScheduledMessageModal and update ReplyBox to pass attachment
* chore: prepend_mod_with to ScheduledMessagesController for better module handling
* fix: attachment visibility in ScheduledMessageItem component
* chore: enhance ScheduledMessage model with validations and reduce controller load
* refactor: simplify ScheduledMessagesAPI methods by removing unnecessary instance variable
* chore: update event emission for scheduled message creation in ReplyBox and ScheduledMessageModal
* refactor: update status configuration to use label keys
* chore: update date formatting in ScheduledMessageItem component
* refactor: collapse logic to checkOverflow and update related functionality
* chore: add author indication for current user in scheduled messages
* chore: enhance scheduled message metadata with author information and localization
* fix: send message shortcut
* chore: handle errors in scheduled message submission
* chore: update scheduled message modal to use combined date and time input
* chore: refactor scheduled messages handling to remove pagination and update related tests
* fix: ensure scheduled messages update status and dispatch on failure
* fix: update scheduled message due date logic and simplify sending checks
* refactor: rename build_message method for send_message
* fix: update scheduled message creation time and improve test reliability
* chore: ignore unnecessary check
* chore: add scheduled message metadata handling in message builder, add scheduled message factorie and update specs
* refactor: use scheduled message factorie creation in specs
* chore: streamline error handling in scheduled message job and remove dispatch logic
* fix: change scheduled_messages association to destroy dependent records
* refactor: remove unused attributes from scheduled message payload builder
* chore: update scheduled message retrieval to use conversation association
* chore: correct cron format for scheduled messages job
* chore: remove migration for author_type in scheduled_messages
* feat: enhance scheduled messages management with delete confirmation and error handling
* chore: set cron poll interval to 10 seconds for improved scheduling precision
* feat: include additional_attributes in message JSON response
* feat: enhance scheduled message validation and localization support
* chore: update scheduled message display
* Merge branch 'main' into Cayo-Oliveira/CU-86aenh268/Mensagens-agendadas
* feat: add scheduled message indicators and validation for message length
* fix: remove unnecessary condition from line-clamp class binding
* feat: update scheduled messages localization and enhance content validation
* feat: update scheduled messages order, enhance scheduledAt computation, and add message association
* fix: reorder condition for Facebook channel message length computation
* fix: change detection for attachments in scheduled messages
* fix: remove unnecessary colon from close-on-backdrop-click prop in ScheduledMessageModal
* chore: add error handling for scheduled message deletion and update localization for delete failure
* fix: enforce minimum delay of 1 minute for scheduled messages and update validation
* fix: remove unused private property and improve locale formatting for scheduled messages
* fix: adjust positioning of DropdownBody in ReplyBottomPanel and clean up schema foreign keys
* docs: add scheduled messages management APIs and payload definitions
---------
Co-authored-by: gabrieljablonski <contact@gabrieljablonski.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes the following updates:
1. Updated the design system color tokens by introducing new tokens for
surfaces, overlays, buttons, labels, and cards, along with refinements
to existing shades.
2. Refreshed both light and dark themes with adjusted background,
border, and solid colors.
3. Replaced static Inter font files with the Inter variable font
(including italic), supporting weights from 100–900.
4. Added custom font weights (420, 440, 460, 520) along with custom
typography classes to enable more fine-grained and consistent typography
control.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.
Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)
This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.
#### Required Attributes on Resolve
Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.
**How it works**
- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.
<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>
#### Custom Attributes Integration
On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.
Each attribute will show badges such as:
- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow
- Pre‑chat form → already existing
<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>
#### Admin Flow
- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.
Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.
<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>
#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
* fix: send signature on whatsapp cloud provider
* fix: simplify attachment checks and remove redundant comments in ReplyBox
* feat: signature preview
* fix: update default signature position to top in Editor and ReplyBox components
* fix: refactor signature application logic in ReplyBox component
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR reverts the plain text editor back to the **advanced editor**,
which was previously removed in
[https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13058](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13058).
All channels now use the **ProseMirror editor**, with formatting applied
based on each channel’s configuration.
This PR also fixes issues where **new lines were not properly preserved
during Markdown serialization**, for both:
* `Enter or CMD/Ctrl+enter` (new paragraph)
* `Shift+Enter` (`hard_break`)
Additionally, it resolves related **[Sentry
issue](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/?environment=production&project=4507182691975168&query=is%3Aunresolved%20markdown&referrer=issue-list&statsPeriod=7d)**.
With these changes:
* Line breaks and spacing are now preserved correctly when saving canned
responses.
* When editing a canned response, the content retains the exact spacing
and formatting as saved in editor.
* Canned responses are now correctly converted to plain text where
required and displayed consistently in the canned response list.
### https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/38
---
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
fixes: #11834
This pull request introduces TikTok channel integration, enabling users
to connect and manage TikTok business accounts similarly to other
supported social channels. The changes span backend API endpoints,
authentication helpers, webhook handling, configuration, and frontend
components to support TikTok as a first-class channel.
**Key Notes**
* This integration is only compatible with TikTok Business Accounts
* Special permissions are required to access the TikTok [Business
Messaging
API](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832183871604753).
* The Business Messaging API is region-restricted and is currently
unavailable to users in the EU.
* Only TEXT, IMAGE, and POST_SHARE messages are currently supported due
to limitations in the TikTok Business Messaging API
* A message will be successfully sent only if it contains text alone or
one image attachment. Messages with multiple attachments or those
combining text and attachments will fail and receive a descriptive error
status.
* Messages sent directly from the TikTok App will be synced into the
system
* Initiating a new conversation from the system is not permitted due to
limitations from the TikTok Business Messaging API.
**Backend: TikTok Channel Integration**
* Added `Api::V1::Accounts::Tiktok::AuthorizationsController` to handle
TikTok OAuth authorization initiation, returning the TikTok
authorization URL.
* Implemented `Tiktok::CallbacksController` to handle TikTok OAuth
callback, process authorization results, create or update channel/inbox,
and handle errors or denied scopes.
* Added `Webhooks::TiktokController` to receive and verify TikTok
webhook events, including signature verification and event dispatching.
* Created `Tiktok::IntegrationHelper` module for JWT-based token
generation and verification for secure TikTok OAuth state management.
**Configuration and Feature Flags**
* Added TikTok app credentials (`TIKTOK_APP_ID`, `TIKTOK_APP_SECRET`) to
allowed configs and app config, and registered TikTok as a feature in
the super admin features YAML.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5e46e1d248631a1147521477d84a54f8ba6846ea21c61eca5f70042d960467f4R43)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-8bf37a019cab1dedea458c437bd93e34af1d6e22b1672b1d43ef6eaa4dcb7732R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-123164bea29f3c096b0d018702b090d5ae670760c729141bd4169a36f5f5c1caR74-R79)
**Frontend: TikTok Channel UI and Messaging Support**
* Added `TiktokChannel` API client for frontend TikTok authorization
requests.
* Updated channel icon mappings and tests to include TikTok
(`Channel::Tiktok`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b852739ed45def61218d581d0de1ba73f213f55570aa5eec52aaa08f380d0e16R16)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-3cd3ae32e94ef85f1f2c4435abf0775cc0614fb37ee25d97945cd51573ef199eR64-R69)
* Enabled TikTok as a supported channel in contact forms, channel
widgets, and feature toggles.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R47)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R26-R29)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R51-R54)
[[5]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R68)
* Updated message meta logic to support TikTok-specific message statuses
(sent, delivered, read).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696R23)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L63-R65)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L81-R84)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L103-R107)
* Added support for embedded message attachments (e.g., TikTok embeds)
with a new `EmbedBubble` component and updated message rendering logic.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR31)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-047859f9368a46d6d20177df7d6d623768488ecc38a5b1e284f958fad49add68R1-R19)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR316)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-cbc85e7c4c8d56f2a847d0b01cd48ef36e5f87b43023bff0520fdfc707283085R52)
* Adjusted reply policy and UI messaging for TikTok's 48-hour reply
window.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R208-R210)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R224-R226)
These changes collectively enable end-to-end TikTok channel support,
from configuration and OAuth flow to webhook processing and frontend
message handling.
------------
# TikTok App Setup & Configuration
1. Grant access to the Business Messaging API
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832184145137922))
2. Set the app authorization redirect URL to
`https://FRONTEND_URL/tiktok/callback`
3. Update the installation config with TikTok App ID and Secret
4. Create a Business Messaging Webhook configuration and set the
callback url to `https://FRONTEND_URL/webhooks/tiktok`
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832190670631937))
. You can do this by calling
`Tiktok::AuthClient.update_webhook_callback` from rails console once you
finish Tiktok channel configuration in super admin ( will be automated
in future )
5. Enable TikTok channel feature in an account
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR restores the plain text editor for all channels except Website,
Email, and API.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
1. This PR is an enhancement to
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13045
It strips unsupported formatting from **message signatures** based on
each channel’s formatting capabilities defined in the `FORMATTING`
config
2. Remove usage of plain editor in Compose new conversation modal
Only the following signature elements are considered:
<strong>bold (<code inline="">strong</code>), italic (<code
inline="">em</code>), links (<code inline="">link</code>), images (<code
inline="">image</code>)</strong>.</p>
Any formatting not supported by the target channel is automatically
removed before the signature is appended.
<h3>Channel-wise Signature Formatting Support</h3>
Channel | Keeps in Signature | Strips from Signature
-- | -- | --
Email | bold, italic, links, images | —
WebWidget | bold, italic, links, images | —
API | bold, italic | links, images
WhatsApp | bold, italic | links, images
Telegram | bold, italic, links | images
Facebook | bold, italic | links, images
Instagram | bold, italic | links, images
Line | bold, italic | links, images
SMS | — | everything
Twilio SMS | — | everything
Twitter/X | — | everything
<hr>
<h3>📝 Note</h3>
<blockquote>
<p>Message signatures only support <strong>bold, italic, links, and
images</strong>.<br>
Other formatting options available in the editor (lists, code blocks,
strike-through, etc.) do <strong>not apply</strong> to signatures and
are ignored.</p>
</blockquote>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/d325ab86ca514c6d8f90dfe72a8928dd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. **Channel-specific formatting and menu options** for the rich reply
editor.
2. **Removal of the plain reply editor** and full **standardization** on
the rich reply editor across all channels.
3. **Fix for multiple canned responses insertion:**
* **Before:** The plain editor only allowed inserting canned responses
at the beginning of a message, making it impossible to combine multiple
canned responses in a single reply. This caused inconsistent behavior
across the app.
* **Solution:** Replaced the plain reply editor with the rich
(ProseMirror) editor to ensure a unified experience. Agents can now
insert multiple canned responses at any cursor position.
4. **Floating editor menu** for the reply box to improve accessibility
and overall user experience.
5. **New Strikethrough formatting option** added to the editor menu.
---
**Editor repo PR**:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/36
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12517,
[CW-5924](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5924/standardize-the-editor),
[CW-5679](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5679/allow-inserting-multiple-canned-responses-in-a-single-message)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
**Dark**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47748e6c-380f-44a3-9e3b-c27e0c830bd0"
/>
**Light**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6746cf32-bf63-4280-a5bd-bbd42c3cbe84"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com>
