549214e96d
361 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
549214e96d | Merge branch main into chore/merge-upstream | ||
|
|
7314c279ee
|
test(leadsquared): make ApiError specs reload-safe (#13098)
- fix the flaky lead-squared spec |
||
|
|
ca5e112a8c
|
feat: TikTok channel (#12741)
fixes: #11834 This pull request introduces TikTok channel integration, enabling users to connect and manage TikTok business accounts similarly to other supported social channels. The changes span backend API endpoints, authentication helpers, webhook handling, configuration, and frontend components to support TikTok as a first-class channel. **Key Notes** * This integration is only compatible with TikTok Business Accounts * Special permissions are required to access the TikTok [Business Messaging API](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832183871604753). * The Business Messaging API is region-restricted and is currently unavailable to users in the EU. * Only TEXT, IMAGE, and POST_SHARE messages are currently supported due to limitations in the TikTok Business Messaging API * A message will be successfully sent only if it contains text alone or one image attachment. Messages with multiple attachments or those combining text and attachments will fail and receive a descriptive error status. * Messages sent directly from the TikTok App will be synced into the system * Initiating a new conversation from the system is not permitted due to limitations from the TikTok Business Messaging API. **Backend: TikTok Channel Integration** * Added `Api::V1::Accounts::Tiktok::AuthorizationsController` to handle TikTok OAuth authorization initiation, returning the TikTok authorization URL. * Implemented `Tiktok::CallbacksController` to handle TikTok OAuth callback, process authorization results, create or update channel/inbox, and handle errors or denied scopes. * Added `Webhooks::TiktokController` to receive and verify TikTok webhook events, including signature verification and event dispatching. * Created `Tiktok::IntegrationHelper` module for JWT-based token generation and verification for secure TikTok OAuth state management. **Configuration and Feature Flags** * Added TikTok app credentials (`TIKTOK_APP_ID`, `TIKTOK_APP_SECRET`) to allowed configs and app config, and registered TikTok as a feature in the super admin features YAML. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5e46e1d248631a1147521477d84a54f8ba6846ea21c61eca5f70042d960467f4R43) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-8bf37a019cab1dedea458c437bd93e34af1d6e22b1672b1d43ef6eaa4dcb7732R69) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-123164bea29f3c096b0d018702b090d5ae670760c729141bd4169a36f5f5c1caR74-R79) **Frontend: TikTok Channel UI and Messaging Support** * Added `TiktokChannel` API client for frontend TikTok authorization requests. * Updated channel icon mappings and tests to include TikTok (`Channel::Tiktok`). [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b852739ed45def61218d581d0de1ba73f213f55570aa5eec52aaa08f380d0e16R16) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-3cd3ae32e94ef85f1f2c4435abf0775cc0614fb37ee25d97945cd51573ef199eR64-R69) * Enabled TikTok as a supported channel in contact forms, channel widgets, and feature toggles. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R47) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R69) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R26-R29) [[4]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R51-R54) [[5]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R68) * Updated message meta logic to support TikTok-specific message statuses (sent, delivered, read). [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696R23) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L63-R65) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L81-R84) [[4]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L103-R107) * Added support for embedded message attachments (e.g., TikTok embeds) with a new `EmbedBubble` component and updated message rendering logic. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR31) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-047859f9368a46d6d20177df7d6d623768488ecc38a5b1e284f958fad49add68R1-R19) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR316) [[4]](diffhunk://#diff-cbc85e7c4c8d56f2a847d0b01cd48ef36e5f87b43023bff0520fdfc707283085R52) * Adjusted reply policy and UI messaging for TikTok's 48-hour reply window. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R208-R210) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R224-R226) These changes collectively enable end-to-end TikTok channel support, from configuration and OAuth flow to webhook processing and frontend message handling. ------------ # TikTok App Setup & Configuration 1. Grant access to the Business Messaging API ([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832184145137922)) 2. Set the app authorization redirect URL to `https://FRONTEND_URL/tiktok/callback` 3. Update the installation config with TikTok App ID and Secret 4. Create a Business Messaging Webhook configuration and set the callback url to `https://FRONTEND_URL/webhooks/tiktok` ([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832190670631937)) . You can do this by calling `Tiktok::AuthClient.update_webhook_callback` from rails console once you finish Tiktok channel configuration in super admin ( will be automated in future ) 5. Enable TikTok channel feature in an account --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
774c168d94
|
fix: z-api read message (#165)
* fix: z-api read messages * fix: use threads for parallel requests * feat: use jobs instead * fix: refactor ZapiReadMessageJob to use service method for sending read messages |
||
|
|
a8ed074bf0
|
fix: Preserve double newlines in text-based messaging channels (#13055)
## Summary
Fixes the issue where double newlines (paragraph breaks) were collapsing
to single newlines in text-based messaging channels (Telegram, WhatsApp,
Instagram, Facebook, LINE, SMS).
### Root Cause
The `preserve_multiple_newlines` method only preserved 3+ consecutive
newlines using the regex `/\n{3,}/`. When users pressed Enter twice
(creating a paragraph break with 2 newlines), CommonMarker would parse
this as separate paragraphs, which then collapsed to a single newline in
the output.
This caused:
- ❌ Normal Enter: Double newlines collapsed to single newline
- ✅ Shift+Enter: Worked (created hard breaks)
### Fix
Changed the regex from `/\n{3,}/` to `/\n{2,}/` to preserve 2+
consecutive newlines. This prevents CommonMarker from collapsing
paragraph breaks.
Now:
- ✅ Single newline (`\n`) → Single newline (handled by softbreak)
- ✅ Double newline (`\n\n`) → Double newline (preserved with
placeholders)
- ✅ Triple+ newlines → Preserved as before
### Test Coverage
Added comprehensive tests for:
- Single newlines preservation
- Double newlines (paragraph breaks) preservation
- Multiple consecutive newlines
- Newlines with varying amounts of whitespace between them (1 space, 3
spaces, 5 spaces, tabs)
All 66 tests passing.
### Impact
This fix affects all text-based messaging channels that use the markdown
renderer:
- Telegram
- WhatsApp
- Instagram
- Facebook
- LINE
- SMS
- Twilio SMS (when configured for WhatsApp)
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6135/double-newline-is-breaking
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
2bd8e76886
|
feat: Add backend changes for whatsapp csat template (#12984)
This PR add the backend changes for the feature [sending CSAT surveys via WhatsApp message templates ](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12787) --------- Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
89d02e2c92
|
fix: Preserve multiple newlines with whitespace in text-based messaging channels (#13044)
## Description Fixes an issue where multiple newlines with whitespace between them (e.g., `\n \n \n`) were being collapsed to single newlines in text-based messaging channels (Telegram, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, Line, SMS). The frontend was sending messages with spaces/tabs between newlines, and the markdown renderer was treating these as paragraph content, collapsing them during rendering. ### Changes: 1. Added whitespace normalization in `render_telegram_html`, `render_whatsapp`, `render_instagram`, `render_line`, and `render_plain_text` methods 2. Strips whitespace from whitespace-only lines before markdown processing 3. Added comprehensive regression tests for all affected channels ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? 1. **Unit Tests**: Added 7 new specs testing multiple newlines with whitespace between them for all text-based channels 2. **Manual Testing**: Verified with actual frontend payload containing `\n \n \n` patterns 3. **Regression Testing**: All existing 63 specs pass ### Test Results: - ✅ All 63 markdown renderer specs pass (56 original + 7 new) - ✅ All 12 Telegram channel specs pass - ✅ All 27 WhatsApp + Instagram specs pass - ✅ Verified with real-world payload: 18 newlines preserved (previously collapsed to 1) ### Test Command: ```bash RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec rspec spec/services/messages/markdown_renderer_service_spec.rb RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec rspec spec/models/channel/telegram_spec.rb ``` ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes |
||
|
|
f2eaa845dc
|
fix: Preserve multiple consecutive newlines in text-based messaging channels (#13032)
## Description This PR fixes an issue where multiple consecutive newlines (blank lines for visual spacing) were being collapsed in text-based messaging channels like WhatsApp, Instagram, and SMS. When users send messages via API with intentional spacing using multiple newlines (e.g., `\n\n\n\n`), the markdown renderer was following standard Markdown spec and collapsing them into single blank lines. While this is correct for document formatting, messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Instagram support and preserve multiple blank lines for visual spacing. The fix adds preprocessing to preserve multiple consecutive newlines (3+) by converting them to placeholder tokens before CommonMarker processing, then restoring the exact number of newlines in the final output. ## Changes - Added `preserve_multiple_newlines` and `restore_multiple_newlines` helper methods to `MarkdownRendererService` - Updated `render_whatsapp` to preserve multiple consecutive newlines - Updated `render_instagram` to preserve multiple consecutive newlines - Updated `render_plain_text` (affects SMS, Twilio SMS, Twitter) to preserve multiple consecutive newlines - Updated `render_line` to preserve multiple consecutive newlines - HTML-based renderers (Email, Telegram, WebWidget) remain unchanged as they handle spacing via HTML tags ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Added comprehensive test coverage: - 3 new tests for multi-newline preservation across WhatsApp, Instagram, and SMS channels - All 56 tests passing (up from 53) Testing scenarios: - Single newlines preserved: `"Line 1\nLine 2"` remains `"Line 1\nLine 2"` - Multiple newlines preserved: `"Para 1\n\n\n\nPara 2"` remains `"Para 1\n\n\n\nPara 2"` - Standard paragraph breaks (2 newlines) work as before - Markdown formatting (bold, italic, links) continues to work correctly - Backward compatibility maintained for all channels ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
141dfc3321
|
fix: preserve newlines and formatting in Twilio WhatsApp messages (#13022)
## Description This PR fixes an issue where Twilio WhatsApp messages were losing newlines and markdown formatting. The problem had two root causes: 1. Text-based renderers (WhatsApp, Instagram, SMS) were converting newlines to spaces when processing plain text without markdown list markers 2. Twilio WhatsApp channels were incorrectly using the plain text renderer instead of the WhatsApp renderer, stripping all markdown formatting The fix updates the markdown rendering system to: - Preserve newlines by overriding the `softbreak` method in WhatsApp, Instagram, and PlainText renderers - Detect Twilio WhatsApp channels (via the `medium` field) and route them to use the WhatsApp renderer - Maintain backward compatibility with existing code ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Added comprehensive test coverage: - 3 new tests for newline preservation in WhatsApp, Instagram, and SMS channels - 4 new tests for Twilio WhatsApp specific behavior (medium detection, formatting preservation, backward compatibility) - All 53 tests passing (up from 50) Manual testing verified: - Twilio WhatsApp messages with plain text preserve newlines - Twilio WhatsApp messages with markdown preserve formatting (bold, italic, links) - Regular WhatsApp, Instagram, and SMS channels continue to work correctly - Backward compatibility maintained when channel parameter is not provided ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
399c91adaa
|
feat: Standardize rich editor across all channels (#12600)
# Pull Request Template ## Description This PR includes, 1. **Channel-specific formatting and menu options** for the rich reply editor. 2. **Removal of the plain reply editor** and full **standardization** on the rich reply editor across all channels. 3. **Fix for multiple canned responses insertion:** * **Before:** The plain editor only allowed inserting canned responses at the beginning of a message, making it impossible to combine multiple canned responses in a single reply. This caused inconsistent behavior across the app. * **Solution:** Replaced the plain reply editor with the rich (ProseMirror) editor to ensure a unified experience. Agents can now insert multiple canned responses at any cursor position. 4. **Floating editor menu** for the reply box to improve accessibility and overall user experience. 5. **New Strikethrough formatting option** added to the editor menu. --- **Editor repo PR**: https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/36 Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12517, [CW-5924](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5924/standardize-the-editor), [CW-5679](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5679/allow-inserting-multiple-canned-responses-in-a-single-message) ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? ### Screenshot **Dark** <img width="850" height="345" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47748e6c-380f-44a3-9e3b-c27e0c830bd0" /> **Light** <img width="850" height="345" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6746cf32-bf63-4280-a5bd-bbd42c3cbe84" /> ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com> Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
797bde6566
|
feat: implement CSAT message handling in WhatsApp services (#161) | ||
|
|
c73ef7f1a2
|
fix: enhance filename extraction for document messages with captions (#159)
* fix: enhance filename extraction for document messages with captions * test: add specs for filename extraction from document messages with and without captions * fix: update media URL stubbing for multiple message types in filename extraction tests |
||
|
|
a8e9acfae9
|
fix: shopify and leadsquared specs in ci (#12926)
fix: shopify and leadsquared specs in ci |
||
|
|
b03dfdb751
|
Chore/merge upstream 4.8.0 (#150)
* chore: Hide "Learn More" button in feature spotlight for self-hosted (#12675) * feat: single query for reporting event stats (#12664) This PR collapses multiple queries fetching stats from a single table to a single query ```sql SELECT user_id as user_id, COUNT(CASE WHEN name = 'conversation_resolved' THEN 1 END) as resolved_count, AVG(CASE WHEN name = 'conversation_resolved' THEN value END) as avg_resolution_time, AVG(CASE WHEN name = 'first_response' THEN value END) as avg_first_response_time, AVG(CASE WHEN name = 'reply_time' THEN value END) as avg_reply_time FROM "reporting_events" WHERE "reporting_events"."account_id" = <account_id> AND "reporting_events"."created_at" >= '2025-09-14 18:30:00' AND "reporting_events"."created_at" < '2025-10-14 18:29:59' GROUP BY "reporting_events"."user_id"; ``` ### Why this works? Here's why this optimization is faster based on PostgreSQL internals: - Single Table Scan vs Multiple Scans: Earlier we did 4 sequential scans (or 4 index scans) of the same data, with the same where clause, now in a single scan all 4 `CASE` expressions are evaluated in a single pass. - Shared Buffer Cache Efficiency: PostgreSQL's shared buffer cache stores recently accessed pages, with this, pages are loaded once and re-used for all aggregation, earlier with separate queries we were forced to re-read all from the disk each time - Reduced planning and network overhead (4 vs 1 query) ### How is it tested 1. The specs all pass without making any changes 2. Verified the reports side by side after generating from report seeder #### How to test Generate seed data using the following command ```bash ACCOUNT_ID=1 ENABLE_ACCOUNT_SEEDING=true bundle exec rake db:seed:reports_data ``` Once done download the reports, checkout to this branch and download the reports again and compare them * chore: Update translations (#12625) * chore: Migrate mailers from the worker to jobs (#12331) Previously, email replies were handled inside workers. There was no execution logs. This meant if emails silently failed (as reported by a customer), we had no way to trace where the issue happened, the only assumption was “no error = mail sent.” By moving email handling into jobs, we now have proper execution logs for each attempt. This makes it easier to debug delivery issues and would have better visibility when investigating customer reports. Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5538/emails-are-not-sentdelivered-to-the-contact --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com> * chore(deps-dev): bump vite from 5.4.20 to 5.4.21 (#12700) Bumps [vite](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/HEAD/packages/vite) from 5.4.20 to 5.4.21. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases">vite's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v5.4.21</h2> <p>Please refer to <a href="https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/v5.4.21/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md">CHANGELOG.md</a> for details.</p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/v5.4.21/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md">vite's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2><!-- raw HTML omitted -->5.4.21 (2025-10-20)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></h2> <ul> <li>fix(dev): trim trailing slash before <code>server.fs.deny</code> check (<a href="https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/HEAD/packages/vite/issues/20968">#20968</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/HEAD/packages/vite/issues/20970">#20970</a>) (<a href=" |
||
|
|
14f43a6bc5
|
fix(zapi): contact race condition (#149) | ||
|
|
08b9134486
|
feat: speed up circleci and github actions (#12849)
# 🚀 Speed up CI/CD test execution with parallelization ## TL;DR - **Problem**: CI tests took 36-42 minutes per commit, blocking developer workflow - **Solution**: Implemented 16-way parallelization + optimized slow tests + fixed Docker builds - **Impact**: **1,358 hours/month saved** (7.7 FTE) across GitHub Actions + CircleCI - GitHub Actions tests: 36m → 7m (82% faster) - Backend tests: 28m → 4m (87% faster with 16-way parallelization) - CircleCI tests: 42m → 7m (83% faster) - Docker builds: 34m → 5m (85% faster) - **Result**: 5-6x faster feedback loops, 100% success rate on recent runs --- ## Problem CI test runs were taking **36-42 minutes per commit push** (GitHub Actions: 36m avg, CircleCI: 42m P95), creating a significant bottleneck in the development workflow. ## Solution This PR comprehensively restructures both CI test pipelines to leverage 16-way parallelization and optimize test execution, reducing test runtime from **36-42 minutes to ~7 minutes** - an **82% improvement**. --- ## 📊 Real Performance Data (Both CI Systems) ### GitHub Actions #### Before (develop branch - 5 recent runs) ``` Individual runs: 35m 29s | 36m 1s | 40m 0s | 36m 4s | 34m 18s Average: 36m 22s ``` #### After (feat/speed_up_ci branch - 9 successful runs) ``` Individual runs: 6m 39s | 7m 2s | 6m 53s | 6m 26s | 6m 52s | 6m 42s | 6m 45s | 6m 40s | 6m 37s Average: 6m 44s Range: 6m 26s - 7m 2s ``` **Improvement**: ⚡ **81.5% faster** (29m 38s saved per run) #### Backend Tests Specific Impact With 16-way parallelization, backend tests show dramatic improvement: - **Before**: 27m 52s (sequential execution) - **After**: 3m 44s (longest of 16 parallel runners) - Average across runners: 2m 30s - Range: 1m 52s - 3m 44s - **Improvement**: ⚡ **86.6% faster** (24m 8s saved) --- ### CircleCI #### Before (develop branch - CircleCI Insights) ``` Duration (P95): 41m 44s Runs: 70 (last 30 days) Success Rate: 84% ``` #### After (feat/speed_up_ci branch - Last 2 pipeline runs) ``` Run 1 (1h ago): 7m 7s ├─ lint: 4m 12s ├─ frontend-tests: 5m 36s ├─ backend-tests: 6m 23s ├─ coverage: 20s └─ build: 1s Run 2 (2h ago): 7m 21s ├─ lint: 3m 47s ├─ frontend-tests: 5m 4s ├─ backend-tests: 6m 33s ├─ coverage: 19s └─ build: 1s Average: 7m 14s Success Rate: 100% ✅ ``` **Improvement**: ⚡ **82.7% faster** (34m 30s saved per run) --- ## 🐳 Related Work: Docker Build Optimization As part of the broader CI/CD optimization effort, Docker build performance was improved separately in **PR #12859**. ### Docker Build Fix (Merged Separately) **Problem**: Multi-architecture Docker builds (amd64/arm64) were taking ~34 minutes due to cache thrashing **Solution**: Added separate cache scopes per platform in `.github/workflows/test_docker_build.yml`: ```yaml cache-from: type=gha,scope=${{ matrix.platform }} cache-to: type=gha,mode=max,scope=${{ matrix.platform }} ``` **Results** (measured from November 2025 data): - **Before**: 34.2 minutes/run average (15,547 minutes across 454 runs) - **After**: 5 minutes/run - **Improvement**: 85% faster, 29.2 minutes saved per run - **Frequency**: 25.2 runs/day - **Monthly savings**: **369 hours** (46 developer-days) This prevents different architectures from invalidating each other's caches and contributes 27% of total CI/CD time savings. --- ## 🎯 Key Findings ### Both CI Systems Now Perform Similarly - **CircleCI**: 7m 14s average - **GitHub Actions**: 6m 44s average - **Difference**: Only 30 seconds apart (remarkably consistent!) ### Combined Performance - **Average improvement across both systems**: **82.1% faster** - **Time saved per commit**: ~32 minutes - **Developer feedback loop**: 36-42 minutes → ~7 minutes ### Success Rate Improvement - **CircleCI**: 84% → 100% (on feat/speed_up_ci branch) - **GitHub Actions**: 100% (all 9 recent runs successful) - Fixed all test isolation issues that caused intermittent failures ### Impact at Scale (Based on Real November 2025 Data) - **CI runs per day**: **30.8 average** for tests, **25.2** for Docker builds - Measured from GitHub Actions Usage Metrics (18 days) - Weekdays: 38-54 runs/day - Peak: up to 68 runs in a single day - **This PR (test suite only)**: - **Daily time saved**: **15.3 hours** (GitHub Actions + CircleCI) - **Monthly time saved**: **458 hours** (57 developer-days) on GitHub Actions - Additional **531 hours** (66 developer-days) on CircleCI - **Combined with Docker optimization** (PR #12859): **1,358 hours/month** (see Summary) - **Developer experience**: 5-6x faster iteration cycles --- ## Code Changes ### 1. **Backend Test Parallelization (16x)** Both CI systems now use 16-way parallelization with identical round-robin test distribution: ```bash # Distribute tests evenly across 16 runners SPEC_FILES=($(find spec -name '*_spec.rb' | sort)) for i in "${!SPEC_FILES[@]}"; do if [ $(( i % 16 )) -eq $RUNNER_INDEX ]; then TESTS="$TESTS ${SPEC_FILES[$i]}" fi done ``` **Why round-robin over timing-based?** - CircleCI's timing-based splitting grouped similar tests together - This caused race conditions with OAuth callback tests (Linear, Shopify, Notion) - Round-robin ensures even distribution and better test isolation - Both CI systems now behave identically ### 2. **Frontend Test Optimization** Enabled Vitest thread parallelization in `vite.config.ts`: ```typescript pool: 'threads', poolOptions: { threads: { singleThread: false, }, }, ``` ### 3. **CI Architecture Restructuring** Split monolithic CI jobs into parallel stages: - **Lint** (backend + frontend) - runs independently for fast feedback - **Frontend tests** - runs in parallel with backend - **Backend tests** - 16-way parallelized across runners - **Coverage** - aggregates results from test jobs - **Build** (CircleCI only) - final job for GitHub status check compatibility ### 4. **Critical Test Optimization** **report_builder_spec.rb**: Changed `before` to `before_all` - Reduced execution time from **19 minutes to 1.2 minutes** (16x speedup) - Setup now runs once instead of 21 times - Single biggest performance improvement after parallelization --- ## Test Stability Fixes (10 spec files) Parallelization exposed latent test isolation issues that were fixed: ### Object Identity Comparisons (6 files) Tests were comparing Ruby object instances instead of IDs: - `spec/models/integrations/hook_spec.rb` - Use `.pluck(:id)` for comparisons - `spec/enterprise/models/captain/scenario_spec.rb` - Compare IDs instead of objects - `spec/models/notification_spec.rb` - Compare IDs for sort order validation - `spec/models/account_spec.rb` - Compare IDs in scope queries - `spec/services/widget/token_service_spec.rb` - Compare class names instead of class objects - `spec/models/concerns/avatarable_shared.rb` - Use `respond_to` checks for ActiveStorage ### Database Query Caching - `spec/jobs/delete_object_job_spec.rb` - Added `.reload` to force fresh database queries ### Test Expectations Timing - `spec/jobs/mutex_application_job_spec.rb` - Removed flaky unlock expectation after error block - Related to original PR #8770 - Expectation after error block never executes in parallel environments ### Timezone Handling - `spec/mailers/account_notification_mailer_spec.rb` - Fixed date parsing at timezone boundaries - Changed test time from 23:59:59Z to 12:00:00Z ### Test Setup - `spec/builders/v2/report_builder_spec.rb` - Optimized with `before_all` --- ## CircleCI GitHub Integration Fix ### Problem GitHub PR checks were stuck on "Waiting for status" even when all CircleCI jobs passed. GitHub was expecting a job named `build` but the workflow only had a workflow named "build". ### Solution Added an explicit `build` job that runs after all other jobs: ```yaml build: steps: - run: name: Legacy build aggregator command: echo "All main jobs passed" requires: - lint - coverage ``` This ensures GitHub's required status checks work correctly. --- ## ✅ Testing & Validation - ✅ **GitHub Actions**: 9 successful runs, consistent 6m 26s - 7m 2s runtime - ✅ **CircleCI**: 2 successful runs, consistent 7m 7s - 7m 21s runtime - ✅ Both CI systems produce identical, consistent results - ✅ GitHub PR status checks complete correctly - ✅ Success rate improved from 84% to 100% (recent runs) - ✅ No test regressions introduced - ✅ All flaky tests fixed (callback controllers, mutex jobs, etc.) --- ## 🎉 Summary This PR delivers an **82% improvement** in test execution time across both CI systems: - **GitHub Actions tests**: 36m → 7m (81.5% faster) - Backend tests specifically: 28m → 4m (86.6% faster) - **CircleCI tests**: 42m → 7m (82.7% faster) - **Developer feedback loop**: 5-6x faster - **Test stability**: 84% → 100% success rate ### 📊 Total CI/CD Impact (All Optimizations) Based on real November 2025 data, combining this PR with Docker build optimization (PR #12859): **Monthly Time Savings**: **1,358 hours/month** = **170 developer-days/month** = **7.7 FTE** | System | Runs/Day | Before | After | Savings | Monthly Impact | |--------|----------|---------|--------|---------|----------------| | **GitHub Actions Tests** | 30.8 | 36.5m | 6.7m | 29.8m/run | 458 hrs (34%) | | **GitHub Actions Docker** | 25.2 | 34.2m | 5.0m | 29.2m/run | 369 hrs (27%) | | **CircleCI Tests** | 30.8 | 41.7m | 7.2m | 34.5m/run | 531 hrs (39%) | *Data source: GitHub Actions Usage Metrics (November 2025, 18 days), CircleCI Insights (30 days)* The combined optimizations save the equivalent of **nearly 8 full-time developers** worth of CI waiting time every month, significantly improving developer velocity and reducing CI costs. All test isolation issues exposed by parallelization have been fixed, ensuring reliable and consistent results across both CI platforms. woot woot !!! --------- |
||
|
|
5f2b2f4221
|
feat: APIs to assign agents_bots as assignee in conversations (#12836)
## Summary - add an assignee_agent_bot_id column as an initital step to prototype this before fully switching to polymorphic assignee - update assignment APIs and conversation list / show endpoints to reflect assignee as agent bot - ensure webhook payloads contains agent bot assignee [Codex Task](https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6912833377e48326b6641b9eee32d50f) --------- Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com> |
||
|
|
c9823d9409
|
feat: Assignment service (v2) (#12320)
## Linear Link ## Description This PR introduces a new robust auto-assignment system for conversations in Chatwoot. The system replaces the existing round-robin assignment with a more sophisticated service-based architecture that supports multiple assignment strategies, rate limiting, and Enterprise features like capacity-based assignment and balanced distribution. ## Type of change - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## How Has This Been Tested? - Unit test cases - Test conversations getting assigned on status change to open - Test the job directly via rails console ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules <!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY --> --- > [!NOTE] > Adds a new service-based auto-assignment system with scheduled jobs, rate limiting, enterprise capacity/balanced selection, and wiring via inbox/handler; includes Redis helpers and comprehensive tests. > > - **Auto-assignment v2 (core services)**: > - Add `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` with bulk assignment, configurable conversation priority, RR selection, and per-agent rate limiting via `AutoAssignment::RateLimiter`. > - Add `AutoAssignment::RoundRobinSelector` for agent selection. > - **Jobs & scheduling**: > - Add `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` (per-inbox bulk assign; env-based limit) and `AutoAssignment::PeriodicAssignmentJob` (batch over accounts/inboxes). > - Schedule periodic run in `config/schedule.yml` (`periodic_assignment_job`). > - **Model/concerns wiring**: > - Include `InboxAgentAvailability` in `Inbox`; add `Inbox#auto_assignment_v2_enabled?`. > - Update `AutoAssignmentHandler` to trigger v2 job when `auto_assignment_v2_enabled?`, else fallback to legacy. > - **Enterprise extensions**: > - Add `Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability` (capacity-aware filtering) and `Enterprise::Concerns::Inbox` association `inbox_capacity_limits`. > - Extend service via `Enterprise::AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` (policy-driven config, capacity filtering, exclusion rules) and add selectors/services: `BalancedSelector`, `CapacityService`. > - **Infrastructure**: > - Enhance `Redis::Alfred` with `expire`, key scan/count, and extended ZSET helpers (`zadd`, `zcount`, `zcard`, `zrangebyscore`). > - **Tests**: > - Add specs for jobs, core service, rate limiter, RR selector, and enterprise features (capacity, balanced selection, exclusions). > > <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 0ebe187c8aea73765b0122a44b18d6f465c2477f. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup> <!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY --> --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
c041090675
|
feat(baileys): upgrade to v7 (#143)
* feat(baileys): upgrade to v7 (#139) * feat(baileys): v7 * chore(zapi): match baileys changes * test: fix send on whatsapp spec * chore: simplify logic and minor fixes * fix: ensure contact avatar updates when profile picture changes * chore: add beta release workflow * feat: enhance contact update logic to handle conflicts in inbox updates (#140) * feat: update GitHub Actions workflow to trigger on release events and adjust GIT_REF handling * fix: prevent unique constraint error when LID contact inbox already exists (#141) * fix: prevent unique constraint error when LID contact inbox already exists * feat(baileys): handle ephemeral messages |
||
|
|
615e81731c
|
refactor: strategy pattern for mailbox conversation finding (#12766)
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com> Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
63a2c70667
|
fix(zapi): first connection issues, and merge existing contact on received message (#138)
* fix(zapi): pairing issues on first connection * fix(zapi): handle existing contact when receiving new message * refactor: simplify logic |
||
|
|
90352b3a20
|
fix: Remove the same account validation for whatsapp channels (#12811)
## Description Modified the phone number validation in Whatsapp::ChannelCreationService to check for duplicate phone numbers across ALL accounts, not just within the current account. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? - Added test coverage for cross-account phone number validation - Using actual UI flow <img width="1493" height="532" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67d2bb99-2eb9-4115-8d56-449e4785e0d8" /> ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
5491ca2470
|
feat: Differentiate bot and user in the summary (#12801)
While generating the summary, use the appropriate sender type for the message. |
||
|
|
f89d9a4401
|
feat: Bulk delete for contacts (#12778)
Introduces a new bulk action `delete` for contacts ref: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12763 ## Screens <img width="1492" height="973" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-31 at 6 27 21 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/30dab1bb-2c2c-4168-9800-44e0eb5f8e3a" /> <img width="1492" height="985" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-31 at 6 27 32 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5be610c4-b19e-4614-a164-103b22337382" /> |
||
|
|
40c75941f5
|
fix: Avoid introducing new attributes in search (#12791)
Fix `Limit of total fields [1000] has been exceeded` https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5861/searchkickimporterror-type-=-illegal-argument-exception-reason-=-limit#comment-6b6e41bd |
||
|
|
7a3544ba99
|
chore: remove zapi feature flag (#132) | ||
|
|
159c810117
|
feat: Bulk actions for contacts (#12763)
Introduces APIs and UI for bulk actions in contacts table. The initial action available will be assign labels Fixes: #8536 #12253 ## Screens <img width="1350" height="747" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-29 at 4 05 08 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0792dff5-0371-4b2e-bdfb-cd32db773402" /> <img width="1345" height="717" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-29 at 4 05 19 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae510404-c6de-4c15-a720-f6d10cdac25b" /> --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
26ea87a6cb
|
fix: Extend phone number normalization to Twilio WhatsApp (#12655)
### Problem WhatsApp Cloud channels already handle Brazil/Argentina phone number format mismatches (PRs #12492, #11173), but Twilio WhatsApp channels were creating duplicate contacts when: - Template sent to new format: `whatsapp:+5541988887777` (13 digits) - User responds from old format: `whatsapp:+554188887777` (12 digits) ### Solution The solution extends the existing phone number normalization infrastructure to support both WhatsApp providers while handling their different payload formats: ### Provider Format Differences - **WhatsApp Cloud**: `wa_id: "919745786257"` (clean number) - **Twilio WhatsApp**: `From: "whatsapp:+919745786257"` (prefixed format) ### Test Coverage #### Brazil Phone Number Tests **Case 1: New Format (13 digits with "9")** - **Test 1**: No existing contact → Creates new contact with original format - **Test 2**: Contact exists in same format → Appends to existing conversation **Case 2: Old Format (12 digits without "9")** - **Test 3**: Contact exists in old format → Appends to existing conversation - **Test 4** *(Critical)*: Contact exists in new format, message in old format → Finds existing contact, prevents duplicate - **Test 5**: No contact exists → Creates new contact with incoming format #### Argentina Phone Number Tests **Case 3: With "9" after country code** - **Test 6**: No existing contact → Creates new contact - **Test 7**: Contact exists in normalized format → Uses existing contact **Case 4: Without "9" after country code** - **Test 8**: Contact exists in same format → Appends to existing - **Test 9**: No contact exists → Creates new contact Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5565/inconsistencies-for-mobile-numbersargentina-brazil-and-mexico-numbers |
||
|
|
a8777f5b04
|
fix(baileys): update LID contact phone number if not present (#129)
* fix(baileys): update LID contact phone number if not present * fix(baileys): move try_update_contact_avatar call to update_contact_information method * refactor(baileys): consolidate contact update logic in update_contact_information method |
||
|
|
c234023a4a
|
feat(zapi): handle contact messages and ignore notifications (#124)
* chore: skip notification messages * feat: contact card messages * fix: notification message handling * chore: reduce code duplication * fix: improve contact name handling in attachment * chore(zapi): promo banner with affiliate link (#126) * chore(zapi): promo banner with affiliate link * chore: remove useless comment * chore(zapi): add note about hardcoded affiliate link * feat: provider.event_received for raw provider events (#127) * chore(zapi): promo banner with affiliate link * chore: remove useless comment * feat: provider.event_received for raw provider events * feat: add provider_event_received handling in webhook listener * feat(baileys): use senderLid as contact identifier (#128) * chore(zapi): promo banner with affiliate link * chore: remove useless comment * feat: provider.event_received for raw provider events * feat(baileys): use senderLid as contact identifier * fix: simplify webhook_data method by removing unnecessary fields |
||
|
|
8ff5834ee8
|
fix(zapi): support for LID-only conversations (#123)
* fix: ignore action events * feat(zapi): allow updating instance ID * feat: handle `chatLid` field * test: break down handler specs into separate files * feat: update send_message method to use recipient_id logic for zapi provider * fix: use identifier instead of source_id for zapi * test: fix specs * feat: prioritize senderName over chatName for contact naming in received callback |
||
|
|
eabdfc8168
|
chore(sidekiq): log ActiveJob class and job_id on dequeue (#12704)
## Context Sidekiq logs only showed the Sidekiq wrapper class and JID, which wasn’t helpful when debugging ActiveJobs. ## Changes - Updated `ChatwootDequeuedLogger` to log the actual `ActiveJob class` and `job_id` instead of the generic Sidekiq wrapper and JID. > Example > ``` > Dequeued ActionMailer::MailDeliveryJob 123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000 from default > ``` - Remove sidekiq worker and unify everything to `ActiveJob` |
||
|
|
254d5dcf9a
|
chore: Migrate mailers from the worker to jobs (#12331)
Previously, email replies were handled inside workers. There was no execution logs. This meant if emails silently failed (as reported by a customer), we had no way to trace where the issue happened, the only assumption was “no error = mail sent.” By moving email handling into jobs, we now have proper execution logs for each attempt. This makes it easier to debug delivery issues and would have better visibility when investigating customer reports. Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5538/emails-are-not-sentdelivered-to-the-contact --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
8d4a6b856a | Merge branch main into chore/merge-upstream-4.7.0 | ||
|
|
4fc80ba4ee
|
feat(zapi): Z-API integration (#115)
* feat(zapi): connect flow and UI updates * fix(zapi): re-add manage connection section * feat(zapi): reply * feat: send message * fix: qrcode job logic * test: qr code job specs * chore: concurrent index * chore: whatsapp model minor * test: message window service specs * chore: service refactor * test: zapi service * chore: zapi beta * chore: minor fixes * test: incoming message specs * chore: minor fixes * feat: handle status transitions * test: refactor spec * test: refactor spec * chore(z-api): use feature flag * chore: fix migration name |
||
|
|
4cb185c501
|
test: fix twilio specs (#119) | ||
|
|
cdd3b73fc9
|
fix: Duplicate contacts creating for Argentina numbers (#11173) | ||
|
|
78ebdbbbd8
|
fix: Normalize URLs with spaces in WhatsApp template parameters (#12594)
This PR fixes URL parsing errors when WhatsApp template parameters contain URLs with spaces or special characters. The solution adds proper URL normalization using Addressable::URI before validation, which automatically handles space encoding and special character normalization. Related with https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12462 ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
66cfef9298
|
feat: Add WhatsApp health monitoring and self-service registration completion (#12556)
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5692/whatsapp-es-numbers-stuck-in-pending-due-to-premature-registration ### Problem Multiple customers reported that their WhatsApp numbers remain stuck in **Pending** in WhatsApp Manager even after successful onboarding. - Our system triggers a **registration call** (`/<PHONE_NUMBER_ID>/register`) as soon as the number is OTP verified. - In many cases, Meta hasn’t finished **display name review/provisioning**, so the call fails with: ``` code: 100, error_subcode: 2388001 error_user_title: "Cannot Create Certificate" error_user_msg: "Your display name could not be processed. Please edit your display name and try again." ``` - This leaves the number stuck in Pending, no messaging can start until we manually retry registration. - Some customers have reported being stuck in this state for **7+ days**. ### Root cause - We only check `code_verification_status = VERIFIED` before attempting registration. - We **don’t wait** for display name provisioning (`name_status` / `platform_type`) to be complete. - As a result, registration fails prematurely and the number never transitions out of Pending. ### Solution #### 1. Health Status Monitoring - Build a backend service to fetch **real-time health data** from Graph API: - `code_verification_status` - `name_status` / `display_name_status` - `platform_type` - `throughput.level` - `messaging_limit_tier` - `quality_rating` - Expose health data via API (`/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:id/health`). - Display this in the UI as an **Account Health tab** with clear badges and direct links to WhatsApp Manager. #### 2. Smarter Registration Logic - Update `WebhookSetupService` to include a **dual-condition check**: - Register if: 1. Phone is **not verified**, OR 2. Phone is **verified but provisioning incomplete** (`platform_type = NOT_APPLICABLE`, `throughput.level = NOT_APPLICABLE`). - Skip registration if number is already provisioned. - Retry registration automatically when stuck. - Provide a UI banner with complete registration button so customers can retry without manual support. ### Screenshot <img width="2292" height="1344" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-30 at 16 01 03@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c417d2a-b11c-475e-b092-3c5671ee59a7" /> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
b75ea7a762
|
feat: Use resolved contacts as base relation for filtering (#12520)
This PR has two changes to speed up contact filtering ### Updated Base Relation Update the `base_relation` to use resolved contacts scope to improve perf when filtering conversations. This narrows the search space drastically, and what is usually a sequential scan becomes a index scan for that `account_id` ref: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/9347 ref: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/7175/ Result: https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/c8a8gb17f0275fgf#plan ## Selective filtering in Compose New Conversation We also cost of filtering in compose new conversation dialog by reducing the search space based on the search candidate. For instance, a search term that obviously can’t be a phone, we exclude that from the filter. Similarly we skip name lookups for email-shaped queries. Removing the phone number took the query times from 50 seconds to under 1 seconds ### Comparison 1. Only Email: https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/h91a6844a4438a6a 2. Email + Name: https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/beg3aah05ch9ade0 3. Email + Name + Phone: https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/c8a8gb17f0275fgf |
||
|
|
e68522318b
|
feat: Enable lock to single thread settings for Telegram (#12367)
This PR implements the **"Lock to Single Conversation"** option for Telegram inboxes, bringing it to parity with WhatsApp, SMS, and other channels. - When **enabled**: resolved conversations can be reopened (single thread). - When **disabled**: new messages from a resolved conversation create a **new conversation**. - Added **agent name display** in outgoing Telegram messages (formatted as `Agent Name: message`). - Updated frontend to display agent name above messages in the dashboard (consistent with WhatsApp behavior). This fixes [#8046](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8046). ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? - Unit tests added in `spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb` - Scenarios covered: - Lock enabled → reopens resolved conversation - Lock disabled → creates new conversation if resolved - Lock disabled → appends to last open conversation - Manual tests: 1. Create a Telegram conversation 2. Mark it as resolved 3. Send a new message from same user 4. ✅ Expected: new conversation created (if lock disabled) ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules ## Additional Documentation For full technical details of this implementation, please refer to: [TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md](./TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md) --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
46b75e1b03
|
feat(whatsapp): add optional phone_number_id parameter to media retrieval API (#11823)
## Description This pull request introduces an optional parameter, `phone_number_id`, to the WhatsApp API call responsible for retrieving media. The addition of this parameter allows for greater flexibility when interacting with the WhatsApp API, as it can now accommodate scenarios where specifying a particular phone number ID is necessary. This change is backward compatible and does not affect existing functionality if the parameter is not provided. Fixes # (issue) ## Type of change - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## How Has This Been Tested? The changes were tested locally by invoking the WhatsApp media retrieval API with and without the `phone_number_id` parameter. Both scenarios were verified to ensure that: - When `phone_number_id` is provided, the API call includes the parameter and functions as expected. - When `phone_number_id` is omitted, the API call continues to work as before, maintaining backward compatibility. No errors or warnings were observed during testing, and all relevant unit tests passed successfully. ## Checklist - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
8162473eb6
|
fix: Contact search by phone number (#10386)
# Pull Request Template ## Description when filtering contacts by phone number a + is always added to the begining of the query, this means that the filtering breaks if the complete phone number with international code and + is entered ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. Updated automated tests Tested manually with contact filtering UI ## Checklist: - [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [X] I have performed a self-review of my code - [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [X] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [X] My changes generate no new warnings - [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
0e41263f9c
|
fix: Ensure messages go to correct conversation when receive multi user in 1 LINE webhook (#12322)
# Pull Request Template ## Description Ensure messages go to correct conversation when receive multi user in 1 LINE webhook. base on [document](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#webhook-event-objects:~:text=There%20is%20not%20necessarily%20one%20user%20per%20webhook). it said ``` There is not necessarily one user per webhook. A message event from person A and a follow event from person B may be in the same webhook. ``` this PR has 1 break changes. In old version. when receive [follow](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#follow-event) event, it will create conversation with no messages. After this PR. when receive follow event, it will not create conversation, contact and messages ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? add test case. and follow event test by delete conversation, and block and unblock line account ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian> Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
b5deecc9f9
|
feat: Accept file attachment in line channel (#12321)
# Pull Request Template ## Description This pull request allow LINE to receive files. ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? add testcase. and test manually by myself. in case you want to test in android, use native share method to share files to LINE. you can share more file types to LINE (native line share only send image,video and audio). ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian> Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
24620a0baf | chore: apply rubocop | ||
|
|
18c672c204 | Merge branch 'main' into chore/merge-upstream-4.6.0 | ||
|
|
239c4dcb91
|
feat: MFA (#12290)
## Linear: - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486 ## Description This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password) authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account recovery. ## Type of change - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## How Has This Been Tested? - Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality - Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation - Verified OTP validation and backup code generation - Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com> Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
9527ff6269
|
feat: Add support for labels in automations (#11658)
- Add support for using labels as an action event for automation - Fix duplicated conversation_updated event dispatch for labels Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8539 and multiple issues around duplication related to label change events. --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
cc21016e6d
|
feat: Add support for customizing expiry of widget token (#12446)
This PR is part of https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12259. It adds a default expiry of 180 days for tokens issued on the widget. The expiry can be customized based on customer requests and internal security requirements. Co-authored-by: Balasaheb Dubale <bdubale@entrata.com> |