# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for removing labels from the conversation card
context menu. Assigned labels now show a checkmark, and clicking an
already-selected label will remove it.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6400/allow-removing-labels-directly-from-the-right-click-menuhttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13367
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e3a6080-a67d-4851-9d10-d8dbf3ceeb04
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<img width="1240" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-05 at 12 39 04 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0071cd23-38c3-4638-946e-f1fbd11ec845"
/>
## Changes
Give the admins an option to delete conversation via the context menu
- enable conversation deletion in routes and controller
- expose delete API on conversations
- add delete option in conversation context menu and integrate with card
and list
- implement store action and mutation for delete
- update i18n with new strings
fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/947
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
The PR includes usability feedback fixes for the conversation card
context menu. A "Mark as Read" option has been added after "Mark as
Unread" to prevent misclicks due to shifting menu positions.
Additionally, a separator line has been introduced for better grouping
and clarity
#### **Orders**
<img width="210" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d7c04356-7cfb-4f43-ac55-beb4167f91e9"
/>
<img width="210" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/593acd58-39cf-4b25-b119-03b89cb3528c"
/>
**Fixes** https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4088/usability-feedback
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### **Loom video**
https://www.loom.com/share/59f8ad3bf4054b299bfcffc0ba24eca1?sid=98fbb67d-c3e9-4fa4-9b04-2a7cb3bf8568
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
These fixes are all auto generated and can be merged directly
Fixes the following issues
1. Event used on components should be hypenated
2. Attribute orders in components
3. Use `unmounted` instead of `destroyed`
4. Add explicit `emits` declarations for components, autofixed [using
this
script](https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/6f549109b96400006bb69bbde392eddf)
We ignore the top level v-if for now, we will fix it later
