Three UX bugs from staging testing:
1. Duplicate Pix link in WhatsApp — the tool's formatted_message
embedded the full link + instructions, so the LLM copied it into
its own response on top of the dedicated link message sent by
dispatch_direct_link_message. The tool now returns a short
summary with no URL; dispatch is the single source of the link.
2. "Reserva confirmada!" sent before payment — the scenario prompt
used the word "confirmação" loosely, which the LLM read as the
reservation being closed. Now the prompt forces "pré-reserva /
aguardando pagamento" until the Pix is actually paid, and the
dispatched link message explains that the reservation is only
secured after payment clears.
3. Memory extraction wrote "Reservou Hidromassagem para pernoite
em 22/04/2026" when the customer only received a Pix link and
replied "obrigado". Tightened the extraction prompt so
padrao_comportamental of a reservation requires a literal
payment confirmation — Pix generated alone no longer qualifies.
When Inter integration fails ("Unit not configured for Pix", missing
certs, etc.), the tool was returning success=true with the error
message as formatted_message. The LLM interpreted that as success and
hallucinated "Pix generated" to the customer — and never triggered the
generate_reservation_link fallback.
Switch the rescue path from tool_feedback_response (success=true) to
error_response (success=false) so the Daniela scenario correctly falls
back to the reservation-link tool as documented in her prompt.
Root cause of the staging test failure:
- Tool asked for CPF then name separately, two back-and-forth turns.
- When the user replied with just "Rodrigo Borba Machado" (no "nome:"
prefix), NAME_WITH_LABEL_REGEX didn't match, so the contact.name
stayed as the emoji "😅‼️". The tool kept returning missing_name and
the LLM eventually hallucinated success without another generate_pix
call.
Changes:
- missing_identity_response combines nome + CPF into one prompt when
both are missing.
- extract_name_from_qa_pattern finds the last outgoing message asking
for "nome completo" and takes the next incoming message as the name
candidate.
- extract_name_run_from_text pulls the leading alphabetic run from the
message so "Rodrigo Borba Machado, 00251938131" parses the name
correctly alongside the CPF.
Problema observado: Daniela chamou generate_pix com arguments vazios apos
cliente informar "27/4". Tool retornou missing_fields=[check_in, amount] e
LLM caiu no fallback silenciosamente.
Correcoes:
- DDMMYYYY_REGEX agora aceita "DD/MM" sem ano (assume ano corrente, empurra
pro proximo ano se a data ja passou)
- parse_date_without_year com fallback explicito
- Instruction da scenario Daniela_Reservas (DB, scenario_id=2) atualizada
para listar todos os 4 parametros obrigatorios de generate_pix e
distinguir requires_input (erro do LLM) de success=false (erro tecnico)
Backup da instruction anterior: /tmp/daniela_instruction_backup_20260418.txt
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- GeneratePixTool: envia payment_link como mensagem outgoing direta (bypassa
hallucination de [Link do Pix] placeholder pela LLM)
- GeneratePixTool: extrai email das mensagens recentes via regex e persiste
em contact.email
- GenerateReservationLinkTool: mesmo padrao de envio direto do link
- Captain::Reservation: after_create_commit callback atualiza
ultima_suite/permanencia/reserva_em/total_reservas em contact.custom_attributes
(aparece no painel lateral)
