* feat(baileys): add status method to fetch Baileys API version and availability
* test: specs
* chore: raise error instead of returning error in version
* feat(whatsapp): add profile picture fetching for Baileys provider
- Add `get_profile_pic` method to `WhatsappBaileysService` for fetching contact avatars
- Include `avatar_url` in contact attributes during contact creation
- Update `MessagesUpsert` handler to fetch and set profile pictures
- Add proper error handling and graceful degradation when avatar fetching fails
* test(whatsapp): add test coverage for Baileys profile picture fetching
- Add test suite for `get_profile_pic` method
- Include test scenarios for successful responses, missing avatars, and error handling
- Add profile picture HTTP stubbing and avatar job expectations to message processing tests
* feat(whatsapp): optimize Baileys avatar fetching and update avatar for existing inboxes
Previously, the profile picture was fetched on every incoming message and avatar updates were only attempted for new inboxes.
This change optimizes the process by:
- Only fetching the WhatsApp profile picture if the contact does not already have an avatar.
- Attempting to update the avatar for both new and existing inboxes.
This logic is based on Telegram's version (app/services/telegram/incoming_message_service.rb).
* refactor(whatsapp): remove unnecessary safe navigation when accessing contact
This reverts an unnecessary change introduced in b918a92.
* refactor(whatsapp): manually rollback change introduced in b918a92
* refactor(whatsapp): rename endpoint to profile-picture-url
* refactor(whatsapp): simplify profile picture response handling
Replaced manual JSON parsing with HTTParty's parsed_response and removed redundant JSON parsing tests.
* test(whatsapp): separate avatar processing test from message creation test
* test(whatsapp): update profile picture test to match actual API behavior
Change test to expect a 404 response when no profile picture exists, instead of a 200 response with partial data.
* refactor: move new functions to helper module
* test: more specs
---------
Co-authored-by: gabrieljablonski <contact@gabrieljablonski.com>
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments
## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing assignment policies and their association with inboxes.
Assignment policies allow configuring how conversations are distributed
among agents, with support for different assignment orders (round_robin
in community, balanced in enterprise) and conversation prioritization
strategies
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test Coverage:
- Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
- Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
- Model specs for community/enterprise separation
Manual Testing:
1. Create assignment policy: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
2. List policies: GET /api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
3. Assign policy to inbox: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies/{id}/inboxes
4. View inbox policy: GET
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/inboxes/{id}/assignment_policy
5. Verify community edition ignores "balanced" assignment order
6. Verify enterprise edition supports both "round_robin" and "balanced"
- testing the flows after enterprise folder deletion
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
* feat: add customizable signature position and separator options
* fix: correct default value note for signatureSeparator and ensure reactivity
* fix: correct watcher boolean conversion and add immediate ui_settings updates
- Fix watchers to convert string props to boolean values for reactive refs
- Add immediate event handlers for switch changes to update ui_settings in real-time
- Ensure proper synchronization between switch states and user.ui_settings
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* fix: split signature content and ui_settings updates to resolve persistence bug
- Use updateUISettings store action for signature_position and signature_separator
- Keep updateProfile for message_signature content only
- Fixes FormData serialization issue that corrupted nested ui_settings object
- Add diagnostic logging to verify data flow
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* clean: remove diagnostic console logging from updateSignature method
- Remove temporary console.log statements added for verification
- Keep core implementation that splits signature content and ui_settings updates
- Keep console.error for proper error handling with eslint-disable comment
- Implementation now ready for production use
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* fix: updateUISettings call in updateSignature method
* chore: move signature application to send-time and add button highlighting (#79)
* fix: move signature application from editor manipulation to send-time
- Remove addSignature/removeSignature/toggleSignatureInEditor from WootWriter
- Remove signature logic from draft handling and canned response insertion
- Apply signatures only in getMessagePayload during message sending
- Add button highlighting for signature toggle when activated
- Prevents signature duplication and persistence in editor content
- Fixes signature position toggle bug
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* fix: escape signature separator to prevent markdown setext heading interpretation
- Escape '--' separator as '\--' in appendSignature to prevent H2 heading creation
- Update removeSignature to handle escaped separators correctly
- Fixes signature separator being rendered as markdown instead of plain text
- Refactor nested ternary to fix ESLint error
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* fix: prevent signature separator markdown interpretation in message processing
- Add fix_signature_separator_markdown method to escape '--' separators
- Update ensure_processed_message_content to fix separators before saving
- Prevents signature separators from being interpreted as setext headings
- Ensures correct message display in channels and email notifications
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* fix: update separator format to use \n--\n instead of escaping
- Change separator delimiter from '\--' to '\n--\n' format
- Update removeSignature function to handle new separator format correctly
- Simplify message processing since separators are already properly formatted
- Ensures consistent separator handling across frontend and backend
Co-Authored-By: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* fix: update signature delimiter format to include extra new lines
* chore: remove comment about signature application logic
* refactor: remove unused method and comments related to signature separator markdown processing
* chore: simplify slash command detection by using updatedMessage directly
* refactor: remove signature logic from draft message handling
* refactor: simplify body empty check by removing signature manipulation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cayo@fazer.ai <cayoproliveira@gmail.com>
* refactor: extract signature settings logic into a separate method
* fix: handle nil ui_settings in signature position and separator methods
* fix: update return value of findSignatureInBody to include position information
* fix: update signature handling in findSignatureInBody and related methods
* fix: adjust delimiter length handling in removeSignature function
* test: add cases for appending, removing, and replacing signatures with various separators
* test: add cases for signature position and separator handling
* test: add cases for updating signature position and separator in ui_settings
* fix: correct typo in comment for findSignatureInBody function
* refactor: simplify translation function calls in MessageSignature component
* chore: refactoring
* chore: refactor
* feat: switch -> select
* chore: refactor and undo changes
* chore: refactor and undo changes
* chore: refactor
* fix: remove old select component usage
* chore: remove useless style
---------
Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gabrieljablonski <contact@gabrieljablonski.com>
## Reference
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12149#issuecomment-3178108388
## Description
setup_webhook was done before the save, and hence the meta webhook
validation might fail because of a race condition where the facebook
validation is done before we saving the entry to the database.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- New inbox creation, webhook validation
- Existing inbox update, webhook validation
-
<img width="614" height="674" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be223945-deed-475a-82e5-3ae9c54a13fa"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5411/actionviewtemplateerror-activestorageunrepresentableerror
### Problem
API endpoints return 500 errors when conversations contain image
attachments that can't be processed by ActiveStorage (e.g., files with
non-ASCII filenames, corrupted images, or malicious XSS filenames).
Root Cause: Commit 6cab74139 removed the representable? safety check
from thumb_url, causing `ActiveStorage::UnrepresentableError` to bubble
up and crash the API when it encountered a malformed image file.
Fix: Rescue `thumb_url` method to catch UnrepresentableError and return
an empty string while logging problematic names for future debugging.
This ensures the messages/attachments api does not break due to a single
corrupted image file.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added specs
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
WhatsApp templates without parameters (body-only templates like
notifications, confirmations) were failing to send with the error:
ArgumentError (Unknown legacy format: NilClass). This affected all
parameter-less templates across marketing messages, notifications, and
utility templates.
### Summary
Fixed flaky Instagram webhook specs that failed intermittently in cloud
environments due to shared let blocks creating conflicting inboxes. The
Instagram channel factory already creates an inbox automatically, but
tests were adding extra ones in shared contexts.
Moved channel/inbox creation to isolated test contexts to prevent race
conditions between Facebook Page and Instagram Direct tests.
### Testing
```
for i in {1..30}; do
echo "=== Run $i ==="
RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec rspec spec/jobs/webhooks/instagram_events_job_spec.rb --fail-fast || break
done
```
Previously, intermittent failures could be reproduced locally. With
these changes, tests achieve ~100% pass rate.
WhatsApp template message errors were not being properly handled because
the `@message instance` variable was only set in the `send_message`
method but not in `send_template`. When template sending failed, the
`handle_error` method couldn't update the message status due to the
missing @message reference, resulting in silent failures with no user
feedback.
This PR fixes flaky test failures in the Instagram webhook specs that
were caused by Redis mutex lock conflicts when
tests ran in parallel.
### The Problem:
The InstagramEventsJob uses a Redis mutex with a key based on sender_id
and ig_account_id to prevent race
conditions. However, all test factories were using the same hardcoded
sender_id: 'Sender-id-1', causing multiple
test instances to compete for the same mutex lock when running in
parallel.
### The Solution:
- Updated all Instagram event factories to generate unique sender IDs
using SecureRandom.hex(4)
- Modified test stubs and expectations to work with dynamic sender IDs
instead of hardcoded values
- Ensured each test instance gets its own unique mutex key, eliminating
lock contention
## Summary
- handle Twilio failures per contact when running one-off SMS campaigns
- rescue errors in WhatsApp and generic SMS one-off campaigns so they
continue
- add specs confirming campaigns continue sending when a single contact
fails
fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/9000
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This update adds support to the coexistence method to Embedded Whatsapp,
allowing users to add their existing whatsapp business number in order
to use it in both places(chatwoot and whatsapp business) at the same
time.
This update require some changes in the permissions for the Meta App, as
described in the Meta Oficial Docs, I'll leave this listed below:
- **history** — describes past messages the business customer has
sent/received
- **smb_app_state_sync** — describes the business customer's current and
new contacts
- **smb_message_echoes** — describes any new messages the business
customer sends with the WhatsApp Business app after having been
onboarded
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Database CPU utilization was spiking due to expensive notification COUNT
queries. Analysis revealed two critical issues:
1. Missing database index: Notification count queries were performing
table scans without proper indexing
2. Duplicate WHERE clauses: SQL queries contained redundant read_at IS
NULL conditions, causing unnecessary query complexity
### Root Cause Analysis
The expensive queries were:
```
-- 41.61 calls/sec with duplicate condition
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "notifications"
WHERE "notifications"."user_id" = $1
AND "notifications"."account_id" = $2
AND "notifications"."snoozed_until" IS NULL
AND "notifications"."read_at" IS NULL
AND "notifications"."read_at" IS NULL -- Duplicate!
```
This was caused by a logic error in NotificationFinder#unread_count
introduced in commit cd06b2b33 (PR #8907). The method assumed
@notifications contained all notifications, but @notifications was
already filtered to unread notifications in most cases.
### The Default Query Flow:
1. Frontend calls: NotificationsAPI.getUnreadCount() →
/notifications/unread_count
2. No parameters sent, so params = {}
3. NotificationFinder setup:
- find_all_notifications: WHERE user_id = ? AND account_id = ?
- filter_snoozed_notifications: WHERE snoozed_until IS NULL
- filter_read_notifications: WHERE read_at IS NULL (because
type_included?('read') is false)
4. unread_count called: Adds another WHERE read_at IS NULL
----
### Solution
1. Added Missing Database Index
- Index: (user_id, account_id, snoozed_until, read_at)
2. Fixed Duplicate WHERE Clause Logic
The term "sorcerer’s apprentice mode" is defined as a bug in a protocol
where, under some circumstances, the receipt of a message causes
multiple messages to be sent, each of which, when received, triggers the
same bug. - RFC3834
Reference: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/9606
This PR:
- Adds an auto_reply attribute to message.
- Adds an auto_reply attribute to conversation.
- Disable conversation_created / conversation_opened event if auto_reply
is set.
- Disable message_created event if auto_reply is set.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
On Aug 2, we had a P0 because of a sudden spike in Sidekiq jobs. The
queue went up to 100k jobs and workers scaled from 400 threads to 1000+.
Most of the jobs were HookJobs, and a large chunk of them were for
Linear but they weren’t doing anything useful.
Turns out, whenever there’s an update on a contact or conversation, we
were triggering all account-level hooks without checking if the event
was relevant. So if someone did a bulk import or ran an update, it would
enqueue a huge number of unnecessary jobs.
This PR adds two checks before enqueuing:
- Whether the hook is active
- Whether the event is relevant for that hook
Add bounced emails to the conversation thread.
Fix Gmail bounce detection by checking the X-Failed-Recipients header.
Currently, bounced emails are rejected as auto-replies, which causes
support agents to miss important delivery failure context. This PR
ensures bounced messages are correctly added to the thread, preserving
visibility for the support team.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes
[CW-4620](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4620/rethinking-custom-domains-in-chatwoot)
<img width="642" height="187" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 8 17 44 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ad2f5dac-4b27-4dce-93ca-6cbba74443fb"
/>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
This PR migrates the legacy OpenAI integration (where users provide
their own API keys) from using hardcoded `https://api.openai.com`
endpoints to use the configurable `CAPTAIN_OPEN_AI_ENDPOINT` from the
captain configuration. This ensures consistency across all OpenAI
integrations in the platform.
## Changes
- Updated `lib/integrations/openai_base_service.rb` to use captain
endpoint config
- Updated `enterprise/app/models/enterprise/concerns/article.rb` to use
captain endpoint config
- Removed unused `enterprise/lib/chat_gpt.rb` class
- Added tests for endpoint configuration behavior
* chore: allow non-admin to call `setup_channel_provider` and add localization
* feat: allow agents to setup channel provider for assigned inboxes and handle unauthorized access
# Creates contact when Instagram returns `No matching Instagram user`
## Description
The error occurs when Facebook tries to validate the Facebook App
created to authorize Instagram integration.
The Facebook's agent uses a Bot to make tests on the App where is not a
valid user via API, returning `{"error"=>{"message"=>"No matching
Instagram user", "type"=>"IGApiException", "code"=>9010}}`.
Then Facebook rejects the request saying this app is still not ready
once the integration with Instagram didn't work.
We can safely create an unknown contact, making this integration work.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
There's automated test to cover.
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
