* feat: add audio transcoding support for WhatsApp Cloud API
- Introduced `Audio::TranscodeService` to handle audio transcoding to OGG/Opus format.
- Updated `Messages::MessageBuilder` to transcode audio attachments based on `transcode_audio` parameter.
- Enhanced `WhatsappCloudService` to normalize audio content types and send voice flag for recorded audio in OGG format.
- Added utility functions for audio conversion in JavaScript.
- Updated Dockerfile to include FFmpeg for audio processing.
- Added tests for audio transcoding and WhatsApp Cloud service interactions.
* feat: enhance audio handling with transcoding support and error management
* feat: improve audio transcoding error handling and enhance audio recording features
* feat: enhance audio transcoding process and error handling for better reliability
* feat: update recorded audio handling to support boolean and array formats
* feat: Implement existing template linking for CSAT surveys
- Added functionality to link existing CSAT templates for WhatsApp channels.
- Introduced a new component for selecting existing templates.
- Updated the dashboard settings page to support template mode switching between creating new and using existing templates.
- Enhanced the CSAT template management service to handle linking existing templates and fetching available templates.
- Updated API routes to include linking and fetching available templates.
- Added tests for the new linking functionality and template availability checks.
* feat: Enhance CSAT template handling and validation across services and components
* feat: Refactor body variable extraction for CSAT templates and update related validations
* feat: Add linked_at field to CSAT template responses and update related handling
* feat: Add tests for ConversationDrop date formatting and CSAT template body variable handling
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes:
The LLM call was wrapped in a transaction. This is an anti-pattern and
caused idle-connections which PG eventually terminated with
`PQconsumeInput() FATAL: terminating connection due to
idle-in-transaction timeout`
This resulted in activity messages being missing in some conversations
on captain handoff, failures queueing up for retry and captain
responding long after conversation was marked open/snoozed.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally and specs
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6494/add-shopify-mandatory-compliance-webhooks-for-app-store-listing
Shopify requires all public apps to handle three GDPR compliance
webhooks before they can be listed on the App Store. Their automated
review checks for these endpoints and verifies that apps validate HMAC
signatures on incoming requests. We were failing both checks.
This PR adds a single webhook endpoint at `POST /webhooks/shopify` that
receives all three compliance events. When Shopify sends a webhook, it
signs the payload with our app's client secret and includes the
signature in the `X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256` header. Our controller reads
the raw body, computes the expected HMAC-SHA256 digest, and rejects
mismatched requests with a 401.
Shopify identifies the event type through the `X-Shopify-Topic` header.
For `customers/data_request` and `customers/redact`, we simply
acknowledge with a 200—Chatwoot doesn't persist any Shopify customer
data. All order lookups happen as live API calls at query time. For
`shop/redact`, which Shopify sends after a merchant uninstalls the app,
we delete the integration hook for that shop domain and remove the
stored access token and configuration.
### How to test via Rails console
```
secret = GlobalConfigService.load('SHOPIFY_CLIENT_SECRET', nil)
body = '{"shop_domain":"test.myshopify.com"}'
valid_hmac = Base64.strict_encode64(OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', secret, body))
```
#### Test 1: No HMAC → 401
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/data_request' }
app.response.code # => "401"
```
#### Test 2: Invalid HMAC → 401
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => 'invalid', 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/data_request' }
app.response.code # => "401"
```
#### Test 3: Valid HMAC, customers/data_request → 200
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => valid_hmac, 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/data_request' }
app.response.code # => "200"
```
#### Test 4: Valid HMAC, customers/redact → 200
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => valid_hmac, 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/redact' }
app.response.code # => "200"
```
#### Test 5: Valid HMAC, shop/redact → 200 (deletes hook)
```
# First check if a hook exists for this domain:
Integrations::Hook.where(app_id: 'shopify', reference_id: 'test.myshopify.com').count
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => valid_hmac, 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'shop/redact' }
app.response.code # => "200"
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
## Type of change
typo fix
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Some customers using WhatsApp inboxes with account-level webhooks were
reporting receiving duplicate `message_created` webhook deliveries for
every incoming message. Upon inspection, here's what we found
- Both payloads are identical.
- No errors appear in the application logs
- Webhook URL is only configured in one place.
This meant, the system was sending the webhooks twice. For some context,
there's a know related issue... Meta's WhatsApp Business API can deliver
the same webhook notification multiple times for a single message. The
codebase already acknowledges this — there's a comment in
`IncomingMessageBaseService#process_messages` noting that "multiple
webhook events can be received against the same message due to
misconfigurations in the Meta business manager account." A deduplication
guard exists, but it doesn't actually work under concurrency.
### Rationale
The existing dedup was a three-step sequence: check Redis (`GET`), check
the database, then set a Redis flag (`SETEX`). Two Sidekiq workers
processing duplicate Meta webhooks simultaneously would both complete
the `GET` before either executed the `SETEX`, so both would proceed to
create a message. The `source_id` column has a non-unique index, so the
database wouldn't catch the duplicate either. Each message then
independently fires `after_create_commit`, dispatching two
`message_created` webhook events to the customer.
```
Worker A Worker B
│ │
▼ ▼
Redis GET key ──► nil Redis GET key ──► nil
│ │
│ ◄── both pass guard ──► │
│ │
▼ ▼
Redis SETEX key Redis SETEX key
│ │
▼ ▼
BEGIN transaction BEGIN transaction
INSERT message INSERT message
DELETE Redis key ◄─┐ │
COMMIT │ DELETE Redis key
│ COMMIT
│ │
└── key gone before ───┘
B's commit lands
▼ ▼
after_create_commit after_create_commit
dispatch MESSAGE_CREATED dispatch MESSAGE_CREATED
│ │
▼ ▼
WebhookJob ──► n8n WebhookJob ──► n8n
(duplicate!)
```
There was a second, subtler problem visible in the diagram: the Redis
key was cleared *inside* the database transaction, before the
transaction committed. This opened a window where neither the Redis
check nor the database check would see the in-flight message.
The fix collapses the check-and-set into a single `SET NX EX` call,
which is atomic in Redis. The key is no longer eagerly cleared — it
expires naturally after 24 hours. The database lookup
(`find_message_by_source_id`) remains as a fallback for messages that
were created before the lock expired.
```
Worker A Worker B
│ │
▼ ▼
Redis SET NX ──► OK Redis SET NX ──► nil
│ │
▼ ▼
proceeds to create returns early
message normally (lock already held)
```
### Implementation Notes
The lock logic is extracted into `Whatsapp::MessageDedupLock`, a small
class that wraps a single `Redis SET NX EX` call. This makes the
concurrency guarantee testable in isolation — the spec uses a
`CyclicBarrier` to race two threads against the same key and asserts
exactly one wins, without needing database writes,
`use_transactional_tests = false`, or monkey-patching.
Because the Redis lock now persists (instead of being cleared
mid-transaction), existing WhatsApp specs needed an `after` hook to
clean up `MESSAGE_SOURCE_KEY::*` keys between examples. Transactional
fixtures only roll back the database, not Redis.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for removing labels from the conversation card
context menu. Assigned labels now show a checkmark, and clicking an
already-selected label will remove it.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6400/allow-removing-labels-directly-from-the-right-click-menuhttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13367
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e3a6080-a67d-4851-9d10-d8dbf3ceeb04
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Langfuse logging improvements
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
For reply suggestion: the errors are being stored inside output field,
but observations should be marked as errors.
For assistant: add credit_used metadata to filter handoffs from
ai-replies
For langfuse tool call: add `observation_type=tool`
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
before:
<img width="1028" height="57" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/70f6a36e-6c33-444c-a083-723c7c9e823a"
/>
after:
<img width="872" height="69" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1b6b6f5f-5384-4e9c-92ba-f56748fec6dd"
/>
`credit_used` to filter handoffs from AI replies that cause credit usage
<img width="1082" height="672" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/90914227-553a-4c03-bc43-56b2018ac7c1"
/>
set `observation_type` to `tool`
<img width="726" height="1452" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e639cc9b-1c6c-4427-887e-23e5523bf64f"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Instruments captain v2
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Local testing:
<img width="864" height="510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/855ebce5-e8b8-4d22-b0bb-0d413769a6ab"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Description
Adds missing analytics instrumentation for the editor AI funnel so we
can measure end-to-end usage and outcome quality.
### What was added
- Captain: Editor AI menu opened
- Captain: Generation failed
- Captain: AI-assisted message sent
### Behavior covered
- Tracks AI button click + menu open from both entry points:
- top panel sparkle button
- inline editor copilot button
- Tracks generation failures (initial + follow-up stages).
- Tracks whether accepted AI content was sent as-is or edited before
send.
### Notes
- Applies to editor Captain accept/send flow
(rewrite/summarize/reply_suggestion + follow-ups).
- Does not change Copilot sidebar flow instrumentation.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Manual verification steps
<img width="1906" height="832" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0ade43b-aa8d-41be-8ca2-20a091a81f60"
/>
<img width="828" height="280" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be76219e-fb61-4a6e-bff5-dc085b0a3cc9"
/>
<img width="415" height="147" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36802c5c-33a7-49ed-bf7e-f0b02d86dccc"
/>
<img width="2040" height="516" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74b95288-bc86-4312-a282-14211ae8f25c"
/>
1. Open a conversation with Captain tasks enabled.
2. Click AI button in top panel and inline editor.
3. Confirm analytics events fire for:
- AI menu opened
4. Run an AI action and force a failure scenario (or empty response
path) and confirm generation-failed event.
5. Accept AI output, then:
- send without changes -> editedBeforeSend: false
- edit then send -> editedBeforeSend: true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
This PR reduces duplicate failure noise for audio transcription jobs
that fail with permanent HTTP 400 responses, and fixes a file-format
edge case causing intermittent 400s.
Sentry issue: [CHATWOOT-99E /
6660541334](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/6660541334/)
## Confirmed root cause
For some attachments, the stored filename had no extension (example:
`speech`, content type `audio/mpeg`).
When the temporary transcription upload file was created without an
extension, OpenAI returned:
`Unrecognized file format` (HTTP 400).
## Scope of changes
1. `Messages::AudioTranscriptionJob`
- Keeps `discard_on Faraday::BadRequestError` to avoid retry storms on
permanent request errors.
- Adds explicit Rails warning logs for discarded jobs with
attachment/job/status context.
2. `Messages::AudioTranscriptionService`
- Keeps guaranteed temp file cleanup via `ensure`.
- Ensures temp upload files include an extension when the original
filename has none, derived from blob `content_type`.
- This addresses intermittent failures like extensionless `audio/mpeg`
files.
## Reproduction
Enable audio transcription for an account and process an audio
attachment whose stored filename has no extension (for example `speech`)
but valid audio content type (`audio/mpeg`).
Before this fix, OpenAI transcription could return HTTP 400
`Unrecognized file format` for that attachment while similar attachments
with extensions succeeded.
## Testing
Ran:
`bundle exec rubocop
enterprise/app/jobs/messages/audio_transcription_job.rb
enterprise/app/services/messages/audio_transcription_service.rb`
Result: both modified files pass lint with no offenses.
## Description
Handle messages with null content properly in UI and email notifications
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Relevant Screenshots:
<img width="688" height="765" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-21 at 4 43 00 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a27c22e-2ae6-4377-a05d-cfa44bf181fe"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Touches notification email templates and message rendering conditions;
mistakes could lead to missing content/attachments in emails or
incorrect UI visibility, but changes are localized and non-auth/security
related.
>
> **Overview**
> Agent notification emails for *assigned* and *participating* new
messages now include the actual message details (sender name, rendered
text when present, and attachment links) and gracefully fall back when
content is unavailable.
>
> To support this, the mailer now passes `@message` into Liquid via
`MessageDrop` (adding `attachments` URLs), and the dashboard message UI
now renders failed/external-error messages even when `content` is `null`
while tightening retry eligibility to require content or attachments
(and still within 1 day).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
475c8cedda54eb5e806990f977faf8098d0b27d8. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
Fixes a critical bug where conversations assigned to a team could be
auto-assigned to agents outside that team when all team members were at
capacity.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Changes core assignment selection for both legacy and v2 flows;
misconfiguration of `allow_auto_assign` or team membership could cause
conversations to remain unassigned.
>
> **Overview**
> Prevents auto-assignment from crossing team boundaries by filtering
eligible agents to the conversation’s `team` members (and requiring
`team.allow_auto_assign`) in both the legacy `AutoAssignmentHandler`
path and the v2 `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` (including the
Enterprise override).
>
> Adds test coverage to ensure team-scoped conversations only assign to
team members, and are skipped when team auto-assign is disabled or no
team members are available; also updates the conversations controller
spec setup to include team membership.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
67ed2bda0cd8ffd56c7e0253b86369dead2e6155. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
